← back to HUM 111
Weeks 3–7George §Gilgamesh198 min full read
7 concepts20 worked examples24 exercises3 exam-level7 figures
What are you here for?

02 Founding Cultures: Gilgamesh

Start with this

One question before you read anything. Getting it wrong is the point: it shows you what this section is for.

§02.0 — what he carries home

A student revising from a summary writes that the hero comes back with the plant that reverses age. The plot really does put it in his hands for a few lines. The question is what he still has at the gate of Uruk at the end of XI.

Find(a) Pick the option that describes what is in his hands at the end.
Given
  • The end of Tablet XI, after the crossing back with Ur-shanabi

  • The plant is fetched from earlier in the same tablet

  • The he brought back a tale from before

Hint 1/4

Do not ask what he found. Ask what is still with him on the last page.

Hint 2/4

Rule for endings here: read the last lines against the first. Whatever repeats is what you are meant to be left holding.

Hint 3/4

The data again: a snake takes the plant while he bathes; he crosses back with Ur-shanabi; his last speech is the prologue's own words about the wall.

Hint 4/4

He arrives with nothing he went for, and the poem hands him the wall instead.

Show solution

We trace one object to its last mention instead of arguing from theme, because the theme is what the wrong answer is made of.

Follow the plant to its last mention

$$\text{Tablet XI, the dive}$$

He really does get it, which is why the wrong answer feels right. Track objects to their last mention, not their first.

$$\text{Tablet XI, the snake}$$

It goes while he bathes and he never returns for it. The loss is casual rather than a punishment scene, and that is the point.

Read the closing speech

$$\text{Tablet XI, closing lines}$$

He tells Ur-shanabi to climb the wall and inspect the brickwork, repeating the prologue almost exactly. A repetition at the end of a long poem is a structural signal: compare these two moments.

Separate what he claims from what he holds

The prologue does credit him with a tale from before the Flood, so he is not empty in every sense. He is empty of the thing he went for and full of the thing he did not.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Nothing he set out for.}\\&\text{He comes home with a report}\\&\text{and a wall.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check it against the frame, not against memory of the plot: if he kept the plant, the closing lines could not repeat the opening ones, because Uruk would have changed.

When a question asks what a character ends with, find the object's last mention, then check whether the ending repeats the opening.

Asked what the oldest surviving long poem is about, you say: a king looks for eternal life and does not get it. True, and worth no marks here. The paper prints nine lines and asks what the wording is doing: not whether he failed, but why he had to fail twice, and why the poem ends at a brick wall.

By the end you can take twenty lines of this poem, say which of its versions they belong to, and turn them into a paragraph a marker can credit.

In 60 seconds

Two poems welded at one joint: an expedition that ends in a killing, and a search for that ends at a wall. The joint is Enkidu's death in Tablet VII.

Name the version before you argue
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Sumerian poems about Bilgames,}\\&\text{Old Babylonian epic,}\\&\text{Standard Babylonian version:}\\&\text{three texts, one king}\end{aligned}}$$

Before any quotation. The famous advice to eat, drink and be merry is Old Babylonian; the eleven tablet poem does not give Shiduri that speech.

The ring closes on the same words
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Tablet I: climb the wall, inspect it}\\&\text{Tablet XI: the same words again}\end{aligned}}$$

Any question about the ending or about what he brings home. The repetition is the .

Enkidu is a double, not a servant
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Enkidu: steppe to Uruk, then dies}\\&\text{Gilgamesh: Uruk to steppe, then home}\end{aligned}}$$

Questions about friendship, about why the gods answer a complaint with an animal, and about the change of subject after Tablet VII.

The paragraph that gets marks
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{claim, then quotation with tablet}\\&\text{and line, then warrant about the}\\&\text{wording, then consequence}\end{aligned}}$$

Every short written answer and every paragraph of the course project. Four parts, one of them the poem's.

Three most common mistakes
  1. Retelling the plot instead of arguing about it. The mark is for what the wording does, not for what happens.

  2. Quoting across a gap as if the lines ran on. The brackets and dots are the state of the clay, not typography.

  3. Treating the Old Babylonian material, the poems and as chapters of one book. They contradict each other on purpose.

Two pages on the programme's own site give two different weightings, and you should know both.

  • General Syllabus, binding on every section, dated 2025 to 2026: midterm course project 30 per cent, final 30, regular quizzes and short assignments 30, participation 10.
  • Undated letter grade page: midterm 25, project 20, final 25, quizzes 20, participation 10.

Plan around the dated one, and check your own instructor's syllabus. Both agree on what matters here: the quizzes are frequent and the final is comprehensive, so the reading cannot wait for a revision week.

How much time do you have?
10 minutes, the night before a reading quiz

Say which version a quoted passage comes from, get the order of events right, and avoid the three answers that give away a summary.

The 60-second card · Three texts, one king · The prologue · Mistake ledger
45 minutes, before a class discussion or a presentation

Three arguable positions rather than a summary: what the double is for, what changes at the death, why two failures and not one. Each comes with a passage attached.

The 60-second card · Enkidu as the double, and what a double is for · The death of Enkidu, and the change of subject · The road to Uta-napishti, and the Flood he tells · contrast pair on the two failures
the whole section, with the Penguin volume open beside you

Write the paragraph rather than recognise it: place an unseen passage, quote it with a citation, say what the wording does. Both the project and the final are built on that.

all seven concepts · Scaffolding comes off · Full exam-style question · A · concept · B · computation · C · exam level · D · interleaved
By the end of this section
  1. Distinguish the Sumerian Bilgames poems, the and the , and say which one an unseen passage belongs to.

  2. Read the prologue as the poem's own claim about itself, and show how the last lines of Tablet XI close the ring that the first lines open.

  3. Explain what the poem gains by making Enkidu a counterpart rather than a servant, using the two transformation arcs as evidence.

  4. Trace how the Humbaba expedition and the refusal of Ishtar build the punishment out of things the heroes themselves say.

  5. Account for the change of subject at Enkidu's death, using the dream of the assembly and the revised curse in Tablet VII.

  6. Compare the Flood in Tablet XI with the versions in Atra-hasis and Genesis, and state what each difference does inside its own story.

  7. Build a graded paragraph from a quoted passage: claim, quotation with tablet and line, about the wording, consequence.

Syllabus coverage

Gilgamesh — covered

The of Gilgamesh in the Penguin : the Standard Babylonian version in eleven tablets, with Tablet XII treated as an appendix.

EPIC I — covered

Epic as the cluster's genre question: what a founding poem is for, and how its frame tells you how to read it.

Iliad — deferred

Homer, the Iliad, in the Fagles translation.

The cluster names two texts and this section takes the first, so nothing here depends on Homer. The comparison worth making is what each poem does with the death of the hero's friend, set up here and paid off in the next section.

Weeks 3-7 — covered

  • Five weeks for the cluster
  • split across two texts
  • with the frequent quizzes falling in this stretch

Atra-hasis and Genesis 6 to 9 — off syllabus

Two other flood narratives, brought in only as a comparison.

Neither is on your reading list and you are not responsible for either. They are here because Tablet XI is hard to read as an argument without something to read it against. If a question mentions Genesis, answer about what Tablet XI does differently.

the five Sumerian Bilgames poems — off syllabus

  • Bilgames and Akka
  • Bilgames and Huwawa
  • Bilgames and the Bull of Heaven
  • Bilgames and the
  • The Death of Bilgames

Printed in the same volume, which is why students quote them by accident. The General Syllabus names only Gilgamesh, so treat them as background: useful for what the epic did that they do not, never evidence about its plot.

Recall first
Culture is something made, and it costs something

The opening cluster put one claim on the table: what we call culture is built rather than inherited, and the building has a price somebody pays. Keep it in that shape, as a bill rather than an achievement.

The first thing Uruk does in Tablet I is complain about its own king, and the first thing the gods do is manufacture a man in the steppe. Neither move reads if culture is a good that arrives on its own.

is a claim about wording

A close reading says: this passage says X, in these words, and the choice of these words rather than others does Y. The test is whether somebody holding the same page could disagree with your sentence.

Every graded piece of writing here is a close reading. A summary of Tablet VI can be accurate and score nothing.

, translation, commentary

Three objects. The primary text is the Akkadian poem on clay. The translation is one scholar's English, with brackets and gaps in it. An introduction is an argument about the poem, and it goes into your answer with the arguer named.

Your volume holds all three, and sentences from the introduction get quoted in exams as if the poem had said them.

A cluster in this course is a question, not a period

The four blocks are organised around problems. This one asks what a poem does when it has to stand at the beginning of a tradition, and it sets two poems side by side.

It tells you what kind of essay question to expect: not what happened in Mesopotamia, but what this poem makes it possible to think.

Try it yourself first (1 questions)
1§02.0 — servant or counterpart

Most people who have heard of this poem describe Enkidu as the hero's loyal sidekick. There is one place in your volume where that is exactly right. The exam risk is using it for the whole poem.

Find
  1. (a) True or false for Tablets I to XI?

  2. (b) Name the one place where the other answer would be defensible, and say why it does not carry over.

Given
  • The statement to judge: Enkidu is Gilgamesh's servant

  • The volume holds eleven tablets plus a twelfth as an appendix

Hint 1/4

Ask what the gods were asked for when they made him.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a character's function is set by the problem he is made to solve. Enkidu answers a complaint about a king; he is not staff for one.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Uruk complains, the gods have a match made in the steppe, the two wrestle to a draw and embrace. In Tablet XII he is alive and runs his master's errand.

Hint 4/4

False for Tablets I to XI. Tablet XII is the exception, and it is an appendix translated from a Sumerian poem.

Show solution

We argue from the commission and the fight rather than from the word friend, because friend is the translator's word and the fight is an event.

Start from the commission, not the friendship

$$\text{Tablet I, the complaint}$$

Uruk complains that the king leaves nobody alone, and the gods have a counterpart made. A servant would solve a labour problem; a counterpart solves a power problem, which is the problem reported.

Use the outcome of the fight as the test

$$\text{Tablet II, the wrestling}$$

They fight in the gateway and no winner is named. A poem that wanted a servant would have given the king a victory, because victories are cheap to write.

Afterwards they embrace and become inseparable, which is the shape of a peer relation.

Locate the counter-evidence honestly

$$\text{Tablet XII, the appendix}$$

Here he is a servant, he is alive, and he goes underground for the king's ball and mallet. Naming the exception yourself is worth a mark: it shows you know the volume has seams.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{False for Tablets I to XI.}\\&\text{True only in the Tablet XII appendix.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Independent check: in Tablet VIII Gilgamesh compares him to a wife, a brother and an axe at his side. None of those is a word for staff.

Settle a relationship question with an event, not with a translated noun. Here the event is the fight.

Notation
symbolreads asmeanswatch out
$I to XI$

Tablets one to eleven

The Standard Babylonian version. This is the set text and the thing a quiz quotes.

Tablet numbers are the poem's own divisions, not a modern chapter scheme.

$XII$

Tablet twelve

An appendix, translated closely from a Sumerian poem and attached to the end of the epic.

Its Enkidu is alive and a servant. Cite it as the appendix or not at all.

$OB$

Old Babylonian

The earlier Akkadian epic, known from the Pennsylvania, Yale and Sippar tablets.

About a third survives, and its wording differs from the Standard Version at exactly the famous moments.

$SBV$

Standard Babylonian version

The eleven tablet poem, the one whose first line gives it its title.

Standard means standardised in antiquity, not authoritative in the modern sense. It is still a version.

$[ ]$

square brackets

Words restored by the editor where the clay is damaged.

Quotable if you say so. A claim resting on a restored word is about the editor.

$...$

ellipsis

A break in the tablet: text that is lost, not text that was omitted.

Never quote across one and call the result a sentence.

$( )$

parentheses

Words the translator added so English works, with no counterpart in the Akkadian.

Never build a close reading on one. It is the translator's grammar.

$Bilgames$

Bilgames

The Sumerian form of the name, used in the five short Sumerian poems.

If you write Bilgames while discussing the epic, a marker will read it as a claim about the Sumerian poems.

$Sha naqba imuru$

he who saw the Deep

The first line of the Standard Version and so its ancient title. The Deep is the freshwater abyss where secret knowledge lives.

These poems are named by their first line, so a title is a quotation.

$Shutur eli sharri$

surpassing all other kings

The first line, and so the ancient title, of the Old Babylonian epic.

Two titles, two claims about the hero: rank against knowledge. A usable observation.

Conventions used here
How to cite this poem

Tablet number in Roman numerals, then line numbers, then the translator: Tablet XI 1 to 7, George. A page number is useless here, because the volume prints four texts. If your instructor wants another format, use theirs; what is not optional is that the reference locates the passage in the poem rather than in your copy.

Line numbering is the only thing shared between translations. A page number tells the marker which printing you own.

Square brackets and dots are the clay, not the typesetting

Square brackets mark words the editor restored from a parallel manuscript or a formula. Dots mark a break where the surface is gone. Quote a restored word if you say it is restored; never build an argument across a break and call the two sides one sentence.

The gaps are not evenly spread, so an argument that ignores the apparatus is often an argument about the editor's guess.

Names change with the language

Bilgames in the Sumerian poems, Gilgamesh in the Akkadian epic. Huwawa in Sumerian and Old Babylonian, Humbaba in the Standard Version. Enki and Ea are one god in two languages, as are Inanna and Ishtar; Utnapishtim and Uta-napishti are two spellings of one name.

Two names in one paragraph reads as two characters. Pick your edition's spellings, say so once, and keep them.

Tablet XII is an appendix, and it disagrees with the rest

In Tablet XII Enkidu is alive and is Gilgamesh's servant, sent down to the netherworld on an errand. In Tablets I to XI he is a counterpart who died four tablets earlier. Use it if you want, but name it as the appendix.

It is a close translation of a Sumerian poem attached to the end of the epic. Treating it as chapter twelve produces contradictions that are not in the poem you were set.

Version discipline for famous lines

Before quoting a famous passage, check which version prints it. The advice to fill your belly and make merry is on an Old Babylonian tablet; the Standard Version's Shiduri does not say it. Label the version in the sentence where you quote.

Half the memorable lines come from the version that is not the set text. Saying which version you mean converts a mistake into a point about how the poem changed.

Dates are ranges, and the king is not the character

Give centuries or ranges, not single years: the Sumerian poems from copies made around 1800 BCE, the Old Babylonian epic in roughly the same centuries, the Standard Version somewhere in the late second millennium. A Bilgames appears in the Sumerian king list; that figure and this character are not the same object of study.

Precise dates here are reconstructions and false precision is easy to spot. The historical question also pulls a close reading into an argument the poem is not making.

2.1Three texts, one king: what you are actually holding

Place a passage in its version before you argue about it, so the argument is about the poem you were set.

Everything else here depends on this habit, because you cannot say what the poem does until you can say which poem.

Solvable with what we have
  • Read an English poem closely and quote it.

  • Say what a character does and when.

  • Give a page reference for a quotation.

Not solvable yet
  • Tell which of three texts a passage belongs to.

  • Tell a gap in the clay from a poet's silence.

  • Tell the poem's words from the translator's.

So a student writes: in Gilgamesh the tells him to eat, drink and enjoy his children, which shows the poem settling for ordinary life. Page reference given, wording accurate.

Why it fails

That speech is on an Old Babylonian tablet. The eleven tablet poem the course sets gives Shiduri a different job: she asks why he looks wrecked and sends him to the . The claim is about a text that is in the same book but is not the set one.

RuleRule 2.1: place the passage before you read it
Conditions
  • The passage is in the Penguin volume translated by George, which prints the Standard Babylonian version, Tablet XII, the surviving Old Babylonian material and five Sumerian poems, one after another.

  • You can see either a tablet and line reference, or enough content to match the passage against a version you know.

  • If neither is available, the honest answer is that the passage cannot be placed, and that is a legitimate thing to write.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Which version, which tablet, which lines,}\\&\text{and is anything in brackets or dots?}\\&\text{Answer those four before you argue.}\end{aligned}}$$

Before the reading starts, say which version the lines come from, where in it they sit, and whether the editor has restored anything. Four cheap questions; each kills a class of wrong answer.

Where the three texts came from, and why they are bound together

The Sumerian poems come first, and they are not one story. Five short poems about a king called Bilgames, copied in Old Babylonian scribal schools around 1800 BCE:

  • a standoff with Akka of Kish
  • an expedition against an ogre named Huwawa, surviving in two versions
  • one about the Bull of Heaven
  • one about the netherworld
  • one about the king's death

They share a hero and no plot. None needs the others, and none is about mortality the way the later epic is.

Someone turned that material into one poem. In the early second millennium an Akkadian poet built a single narrative out of it, with one arc and one problem. Titled by its first line, as these poems were: Surpassing all other kings. It survives in pieces, and that surviving third holds many of the lines people quote as the poem.

Then it was rebuilt again, and that rebuild is your set text. Late in the second millennium the poem was reworked into eleven tablets under a new first line and title, He who saw the Deep; Babylonian scholarly lists credit Sin-leqi-unninni. The changes are not cosmetic:

  • knowledge replaces rank at the front
  • the Flood becomes a long first-person speech
  • an address to the reader frames the whole

Tablet XII was bolted on afterwards. It is a close Akkadian rendering of part of the Sumerian netherworld poem, and it does not fit: Enkidu is alive in it and he is a servant. Scribes kept it attached anyway, which tells you something about how ancient texts were curated. They were not edited for consistency.

Lost for two thousand years, then found in a library. The largest group of manuscripts came out of Nineveh in the 1850s, from Ashurbanipal's collection. In 1872 George Smith read the Flood tablet and recognised Genesis in it. Hence the Flood's fame, and hence the usual upside-down picture: the Flood is a speech inside a story about grief.

What follows, practically. Your volume is an anthology with one continuous page numbering, so a page number identifies your printing and nothing else. A tablet and line reference identifies the poem. That is the whole reason the citation rule below looks fussy.

Looks like this, but is not

Modern editions of old poems normally have one text and a list of variants at the foot of the page, so a student assumes this volume works the same way and that the extra material is evidence for the main text.

Here the extra material is other poems. The Old Babylonian tablets are not variants of the Standard Version; they are an earlier work with its own shape, and the Sumerian poems are a different genre. Nothing at the foot of the page will tell you which one you have wandered into.

textancient titlestatewhat you may argue from it

Five Sumerian poems

each named by its first line

several nearly complete

What the Akkadian epic invented. Never the epic's plot or its view of death.

Old Babylonian epic

Surpassing all other kings

about a third survives

How the poem changed. Label it Old Babylonian every time.

Standard Babylonian version

He who saw the Deep

eleven tablets, with gaps

Everything your quizzes and your final will be about.

Tablet XII

no separate title

complete enough to read

How scribes handled inherited material. Not the Enkidu of Tablets I to VIII.

Read row three as your default and the others as things you have to announce. Row two is where marks are lost, because that is where the quotable lines are.

Placing an unlabelled speech about filling your belly

A hand-out prints a speech: a tavern-keeper says the gods kept life in their own hands, so he should fill his belly, be merry, wash, keep his clothes clean, and attend to the child holding his hand. Underneath, in full: Gilgamesh, trans. George, p. 124. You are asked what it shows about the poem's attitude to death.

FindWhich text the passage belongs to, and what you may claim once you know
Given
  • A tavern-keeper speaking to the hero

  • Advice to eat, wash, dress well and enjoy a child

  • A reference consisting of a translator and a page number

Solution

We test the reference before the content, because a reference that cannot fail cannot help, and spotting that takes five seconds.

Test the reference first

$$\text{trans. George, p. 124}$$

A page number here cannot distinguish the Standard Version from the Old Babylonian tablets, since both sit in one page sequence. The reference carries no information about which poem this is.

The content is enough to place it, and placing from content is the skill being tested.

Match the content against the version you know

$$\text{Tablet X, Standard Version}$$

There Shiduri asks why his face is drawn and his cheeks hollow, then tells him about the crossing and Ur-shanabi. She does not advise him to enjoy his life.

$$\text{Old Babylonian, Sippar tablet}$$

The advice to fill the belly stands there, in the same character's mouth. Two versions, one character, two jobs.

Say what the placement now allows

You may claim that the earlier epic offered ordinary life as a settled answer to mortality and the later version withdrew the offer. That is a stronger claim than the one the hand-out was fishing for.

You may not claim that your poem tells him to eat, drink and be merry, because its Shiduri never says it.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Old Babylonian, the Sippar tablet.}\\&\text{Cite it as Old Babylonian, never as Tablet X.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check from the other end: in the Standard Version, Tablet X would then hold both a settled answer to death and a failed search for a cure. The argument is between versions.

When a hand-out gives you a translator and a page and nothing else, the placement is part of the question.

A passage with a ball and a mallet in it

A discussion question quotes lines in which Enkidu offers to go down and fetch something the hero dropped into the netherworld, a ball and its mallet, and is warned not to behave like a living man once he is there. You are asked to use it as evidence of loyalty to the point of self-destruction.

FindWhere the passage sits, and whether the question can be answered as asked
Given
  • Enkidu alive and volunteering for an errand

  • A ball and a mallet lost into the netherworld

  • Instructions about how to behave among the dead

Solution

We start from the one fact that cannot be true in the main poem, because a single impossibility places a passage faster than theme matching.

Notice the impossible fact

$$\text{Enkidu, alive}$$

He dies at the end of Tablet VII and Tablets VIII to XI are about his absence. Any passage with him alive on an errand is outside the eleven tablet poem.

The errand is the giveaway: nothing in Tablets I to VII involves a lost ball, and that Gilgamesh does not send Enkidu anywhere.

Identify the text

$$\text{Tablet XII, the appendix}$$

A close translation of part of the Sumerian poem about Bilgames and the netherworld. Its Enkidu is a servant and its interest is in what the dead can expect.

The Sumerian original is also in your volume, which is why the scene turns up twice with different names.

Answer the question you can actually answer

Refuse the framing in one clause: this is from the appendix, where Enkidu is a servant, so it cannot show anything about the friendship in Tablets I to VIII.

Then give the marker something: the appendix is evidence about how the netherworld was imagined, and Tablet VII has its own netherworld dream to compare it with.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Tablet XII, the appendix.}\\&\text{Not usable as evidence about the friendship.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Independent check: in the main poem he learns about the dead from a dying man's dream; in Tablet XII from an Enkidu who walked down and came back.

One impossible fact places a passage faster than any amount of theme matching. Look for the detail that cannot be true.

Checkpoint
§02.1 — what a page number cannot tell you

Thirty seconds. A classmate photographs a quotation, captions it Gilgamesh p. 98, and asks whether that is a good enough reference for a quiz answer.

Find(a) Pick the sharpest single objection to the reference.
Given
  • The volume prints four different texts in one sequence of pages

  • The quotation itself is copied accurately

Hint 1/4

Ask what a reader would have to do to check it against the poem rather than against your book.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a reference has to locate the passage in the text. A page locates it in a printing.

Hint 3/4

The data again: this volume prints the Standard Version, Tablet XII, the Old Babylonian material and five Sumerian poems, numbered through in one run.

Hint 4/4

A page number cannot say which of those four the quotation comes from.

Show solution

We ask what the reference has to do in a four-text volume rather than arguing about page numbers in general, because the objection has to name a failure the marker can check.

Ask what the reference has to do

It exists so somebody else can find the passage, and that somebody has a different printing or no printing at all. Tablet and line survive those cases; a page number does not.

Name the specific failure

The failure is not vagueness, it is ambiguity between texts. Page 98 might be the Standard Version or the Old Babylonian epic, and those two answer the poem's central question differently.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{It does not say which of the four}\\&\text{texts the quotation comes from.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Try to defeat it: if the volume printed only the Standard Version, the page number would be inconvenient rather than ambiguous. The objection rests on a fact about this book.

In a multi-text volume the locator has to name the text first. Everything after that is decoration.

⚠ Citing a page in an anthology as if it were a single text

Every other course lets you do it, and the volume looks like one book because it has one spine and one page sequence.

wrong$$\text{Gilgamesh, trans. George, p. 124}$$
right$$\text{Gilgamesh, OB Sippar tablet, trans. George}$$
⚠ Calling the Standard Version the original

It is the longest and the one everybody teaches, so it feels primary. Standard means standardised by ancient scribes, not first.

wrong$$\text{the original Epic of Gilgamesh, Tablet X}$$
right$$\text{the Standard Babylonian version, Tablet X}$$

2.2The prologue: the poem's own instructions to you

Read the first lines as a thesis, so the ending reads as a return rather than a defeat.

We can place the text now, so we can read its first page as what it is: instructions about how the rest is to be taken.

RuleRule 2.2: the frame is the argument
Conditions
  • The poem opens with an rather than a name, and names knowledge before rank: he who saw the Deep, the foundation of the land.

  • The opening addresses a reader directly and gives that reader a task: climb the wall, walk along it, inspect the foundations, look at the brickwork.

  • The same instruction returns near the end of Tablet XI, spoken by Gilgamesh to Ur-shanabi, in almost the same words.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Words repeated at both ends of a poem}\\&\text{are the poem naming its own subject.}\end{aligned}}$$

When a long poem ends by repeating the lines it began with, the repetition is not decoration and not forgetfulness. It is the poem telling you which of its events was the frame and which were the contents.

Four things the first page does, one at a time

It names him by what he knows, not by what he rules. The Old Babylonian epic began with rank: surpassing all other kings. The Standard Version begins with the Deep, the freshwater abyss of secret knowledge. Titled by their first lines, these poems make a retitling an argument: the subject is an education, not a career.

It claims he came back with something. Four things, says the prologue:

  • he saw what was secret
  • he came a long and exhausting road
  • he brought back a tale of the time before the Flood
  • he set his labours down in writing

At the end he has no object and no cure. What he has is a story, which is the thing you are holding.

It puts you on the wall. The imperatives are in the second person: go up, walk, inspect, look. You are given a survey task on a piece of masonry. That is an unusual way to open a heroic poem, and it means the first proposed proof of the hero's worth is a building rather than a battle.

It points at a tablet box and tells you to read. The prologue describes a stone box in the wall, a lapis tablet inside, and tells you to open it and read. The poem stages its own reading. The frame closes when Gilgamesh speaks the survey instruction to the ferryman: hero and reader at one wall, told to look.

Looks like this, but is not

A blurb does the same job at first glance: who the hero is, that he is extraordinary, a journey promised, an invitation in. You could summarise this prologue in that register and nothing would be false.

A blurb is outside the work and cannot be quoted against it. This prologue is inside, and it makes a claim about the hero that the plot then complicates, so you can set the two against each other. A blurb can never give you that.

What the second-person imperatives are doing in the prologue

A quiz prints the survey instruction from Tablet I, telling somebody to climb the wall of Uruk, walk its length, inspect the foundation terrace and examine the brickwork, and asks what the grammar tells you about the poem's idea of achievement.

FindA claim about the hero's achievement that rests on the grammar
Given
  • Imperative verbs in the second person

  • The objects are a wall, a terrace and baked bricks

  • The same instruction returns at the end of Tablet XI

Solution

We argue from the verb forms rather than from the theme of civilisation, because the verb forms are on the page.

Describe the grammar before interpreting it

$$\text{Tablet I, the survey lines}$$

Every main verb is an order addressed to you. The poem does not describe the wall; it makes you inspect it.

Skip this step and you end up talking about walls in general.

Note the objects too: not height or gates but foundations and brickwork, the parts you check when you want to know whether something will last.

Ask what an order buys that a description does not

A description asks for belief; an order asks for verification. The poem offers evidence that can in principle be checked, which is a different claim from saying he was the greatest of kings.

Hence the objects: you cannot verify glory, but you can put your hand on a brick.

Close the loop with the repetition

$$\text{Tablet XI, closing lines}$$

He gives the same order to Ur-shanabi after coming home with nothing. The only proof of worth the poem offers at the end is the one it offered at the start, and everything between has been used up.

So the claim is: the poem's measure of achievement is durable work, and it says so twice, in the imperative, at both ends.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The grammar makes the reader an inspector,}\\&\text{so the achievement offered is checkable}\\&\text{work, not reported glory.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check by substitution: rewrite the lines as a description, the wall of Uruk was mighty and its brickwork fine. Everything the argument depends on disappears.

When a passage is unusually plain, look at its grammar. Plain content with strange grammar is where close readings come from.

Two-thirds god: reading a fraction that cannot be a fraction

The prologue says Gilgamesh is two-thirds god and one-third human, and gives him a goddess mother and a mortal king for a father. A student writes that this is biologically inconsistent. The question is what the fraction is for.

FindWhat work the fraction does in the poem
Given
  • Two-thirds divine, one-third human

  • Mother: the goddess Ninsun. Father: Lugalbanda, a king

  • He is going to die, and the poem knows it from the first page

Solution

We treat the number as a ranking device rather than a measurement, because the poem uses it once and never computes with it again.

Concede the arithmetic and set it aside

The student is right that the numbers do not come from parentage, and saying so is worth a sentence, not a paragraph. When a text gives numbers that cannot be literal, ask what the numbers rank.

Ask what the fraction ranks

$$\text{Tablet I, the proportions}$$

It puts him outside both categories: not a god, because a third of him is not, and not an ordinary man, because two thirds of him is not. A clean half would have made him a familiar type, the child of two worlds.

The lopsided fraction is sharper: mostly divine and still mortal, which is the combination that will make his death unbearable to him.

Connect the fraction to the plot it predicts

$$\text{Tablets IX to XI}$$

His refusal to accept death is not vanity in this light. He was told on the first page that he is mostly god, and the one third is what kills him.

The search for a cure is the behaviour of somebody with grounds to expect an exemption.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The fraction ranks him outside both}\\&\text{categories, and the leftover third}\\&\text{is the premise of the whole quest.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Sanity check: at half and half he would have no special grounds to expect exemption, so the quest would need another motive. Changing the number changes the plot.

When a number will not compute, ask what it ranks. The leftover third is the premise of the whole quest.

Checkpoint
§02.2 — why the closing repetition matters

Thirty seconds. Near the end of Tablet XI, Gilgamesh tells Ur-shanabi to climb the wall of Uruk and inspect the brickwork, in almost the words the prologue used to the reader.

Find(a) Pick the reading of that repetition which the text supports best.
Given
  • The same instruction appears at both ends of the poem

  • Between them he has lost Enkidu, the plant and the chance of life

Hint 1/4

Ask what changes and what stays the same, and who is addressed each time.

Hint 2/4

Rule from this concept: repeated words at the ends of a poem name its subject. Read the repetition as a claim.

Hint 3/4

The data again: at the start the reader is told to inspect the wall; at the end Gilgamesh tells the ferryman to do it, having come back with nothing.

Hint 4/4

The wall is the only achievement offered twice, so it is the one the poem stands behind.

Show solution

We compare the two speech situations rather than weighing the two readings against each other, because the speakers differ and that difference is on the tablet.

Compare the two speech situations

First an unnamed voice instructs a reader; then the hero instructs a working man who has just ferried him home. The movement is from the poem's authority to the hero's own mouth, which is a form of agreement rather than collapse.

Test the futility reading against that

Futility would be well served by silence or by a . The poem gives him an instruction to inspect masonry, which is an act of pointing at something that exists.

Futility is not wrong about the quest; it is wrong as a reading of these lines.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{It marks the wall as the one claim}\\&\text{the poem will stand behind twice.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Cross-check the prologue's other claim, that he brought back a tale and wrote it down. Both surviving achievements outlast a person and neither is life.

When two readings both sound respectable, look for something the text varies. The variation is the evidence.

⚠ Treating the prologue as a summary you can skip

It reads like a blurb, and blurbs are skippable. This one contains the claim the ending answers.

wrong$$\text{the poem really begins when Enkidu is made}$$
right$$\text{the prologue states the claim the ending tests}$$
⚠ Making the two-thirds fraction a biology problem

The numbers invite arithmetic, and catching an inconsistency feels like close reading. It is close reading of the wrong object.

wrong$$\text{two thirds plus one third is impossible for two parents}$$
right$$\text{the fraction ranks him outside both categories}$$

2.3Enkidu as the double, and what a double is for

Enkidu is built as a counterpart, which lets the poem put the hero's problem outside him and then kill it.

The prologue promised knowledge brought back from a long road. The poem's first move towards that road is to manufacture a second man.

NoteTwo ways to read Enkidu, and what each one costs
Conditions
  • Reading one, the double: Enkidu exists to be Gilgamesh's match, so the poem can put a problem inside the hero outside him and then take it away. It explains the wrestling draw, the shared dreams and the size of the grief. It can make Enkidu look like a device rather than a character.

  • Reading two, the test case for culture: Enkidu exists so the poem can show a human being made out of an animal by sex, bread, beer, oil and clothes. It explains the shepherds' camp in detail nobody would write for a device. It does not explain why he has to die.

  • Both readings are standard and they are not exclusive. In an answer, name the one you are using and say what it cannot do. That sentence is worth more than picking the fashionable side.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{A double lets the poem place the hero's}\\&\text{problem outside him, and then remove it.}\end{aligned}}$$

If you want to show a king what mortality is, giving him a counterpart and then killing the counterpart is more efficient than threatening him. He watches his own equal die, and the lesson is delivered without the poem having to end.

The five steps the poem takes to build him

The complaint is about power, not labour. In Tablet I the people of Uruk are worn out by their king: no young man left alone, no girl left to her mother. Read as a claim about marriage rights, the wording is too damaged to settle. The shape is certain: a city reports a king with nothing to push against.

The gods answer with a match, made of clay in the wild. The mother goddess pinches off clay and makes a counterpart: hairy, grazing with the gazelles, filling in the hunter's pits. Notice what was ordered: not a punishment, not a rival king, but an equal. An imbalance was reported; the answer is a counterweight.

Shamhat is the mechanism, and the poem prices it. A hunter complains, Gilgamesh sends Shamhat, and after six days and seven nights the animals run from Enkidu. His body is diminished and his understanding widened, says the text: a trade stated as a trade. He loses the steppe and gains a mind that can hold a plan. Quote it.

Bread, beer, oil and clothes finish the job. At the shepherds' camp he does not know what bread is, learns to drink beer, becomes cheerful, is washed, rubbed with oil and dressed. The poem spends real space on groceries, which is where the second reading gets its strength: nobody writes a beer lesson for a plot device.

The fight settles the relation, and settles it level. Enkidu blocks the way to a wedding, they wrestle in the gateway, the doorpost shakes, and no winner is named. Then they embrace and become inseparable. From here the poem can send them anywhere together, and it has a second body it can spend.

Looks like this, but is not

The loyal companion who fights beside the hero and dies for him is one of the oldest shapes in narrative, and Enkidu fits it well enough that summaries always use it. Tablet XII even supplies a version where he really is the servant.

A companion is recruited; Enkidu is commissioned as an equal by gods answering a complaint about the hero. A companion's death raises the stakes of the mission; Enkidu's death cancels the mission and starts another one.

Six days and seven nights, and the sentence that prices it

A discussion question asks whether the poem approves of what Shamhat does to Enkidu. Students answer with their own view of civilisation. The poem has a sentence about it, and the sentence is exact.

FindWhat the poem itself says the change costs and buys
Given
  • Six days and seven nights with Shamhat

  • Afterwards the gazelles run from him

  • The text reports his body diminished and his understanding enlarged

Solution

We use the poem's own evaluative clause rather than a theory of civilisation, because the clause is quotable.

Separate the event from the evaluation

$$\text{Tablet I, after the seven nights}$$

The event is that the animals reject him. The evaluation is the clause about body and understanding, and that clause is the poem's own accounting rather than a modern reading.

Answers that skip it end up arguing about whether civilisation is good. Answers that quote it argue about what this poem thinks it costs.

Read the two halves against each other

Diminished and enlarged sit in one breath and do not measure the same thing: one physical, one mental. The poem is not saying he got worse or better; it is saying he was converted, at a rate.

Converted into somebody who can be a friend, keep a promise and argue about a plan, none of which is open to the creature filling in pits.

Answer the approval question without moralising

The poem neither approves nor condemns; it invoices. Write that, then use the invoice: the same trade is what makes him able to die as a person, which is what the second half of the poem needs.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The poem prices the change rather than}\\&\text{judging it: body down, understanding up.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check a later tablet: dying, he curses Shamhat and then blesses her after Shamash lists the bread, beer, clothes and friend. Same ledger, same items.

If the poem prices something, quote the price instead of supplying a verdict of your own.

Why the wrestling match has to be a draw

An exam question asks what would change if Gilgamesh had beaten Enkidu in the gateway. Counterfactual questions look unfair and are generous: they let you show what a scene is for.

FindWhat the draw makes possible that a victory would not
Given
  • They wrestle in the gateway; the doorpost is shaken

  • No winner is named, and they embrace afterwards

  • The expedition to the Cedar Forest is proposed immediately after

Solution

We test the counterfactual against two later tablets, because a counterfactual is only as good as the damage it can show.

State what a victory would have produced

A defeated Enkidu is a follower. He could still go to the forest, but his warnings on the road would carry no weight, because a beaten man's caution reads as fear.

And his death would be the loss of a subordinate, which is a smaller event: grief in epic scales with equality.

Show what the draw does produce

$$\text{Tablets IV and V}$$

On the road Enkidu interprets the dreams and steadies Gilgamesh, and at the killing he is the one who insists. Both need him to be an equal, and the draw is where the equality was established.

Close on the commission

$$\text{Tablet I, the gods' order}$$

The gods were asked for a match. A victory would mean the order was not filled, and the poem would have to explain that.

The draw is the fight delivering on the premise of the first tablet.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The draw makes Enkidu's later warnings}\\&\text{and his death weigh as much as a peer's.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Look for a place that relies on the equality: Tablet VIII compares him to a wife, a brother and an axe. All three are level relations.

Counterfactual questions ask what a scene is load-bearing for. Find two later places that would collapse and you have answered.

Checkpoint
§02.3 — what the gods were asked to make

Thirty seconds. In Tablet I the people of Uruk complain about their king and the gods respond by having a man made in the steppe.

Find
  1. (a) True or false?

  2. (b) Give the one word in the commission that settles it.

Given
  • The statement to judge: the gods make Enkidu in order to punish Gilgamesh

  • The creature is made as a counterpart and the later fight ends level

Hint 1/4

Ask what the city asked for, and what a punishment would have looked like.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a character's function is set by the problem he is made to solve. Read the commission, not the consequences.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the city reports a king who leaves nobody alone; the gods order a match; the match wrestles him to a draw and becomes his friend.

Hint 4/4

False. He is commissioned as a counterpart, and the draw confirms it.

Show solution

We compare the order with an actual punishment inside the same poem rather than reasoning from the city's complaint, because the poem supplies its own control case.

Compare with an actual punishment in the same poem

$$\text{Tablet VI, the Bull of Heaven}$$

When the gods do punish Uruk they send a bull that kills hundreds in the streets. Enkidu kills nobody, joins the king and defends him on the road.

Read the outcome back onto the order

The fight ends level and the friendship is immediate, so the creature performed the function of a counterweight. A punishment that becomes the victim's closest friend within one tablet would be a strange punishment.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{False: a counterpart was ordered,}\\&\text{and the draw shows it was delivered.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Independent check: the poem does punish the pair later, in Tablet VII, six tablets after Enkidu is made.

Test a label by finding the poem's own example of the thing. If the two do not match, the label is yours and not the poem's.

⚠ Calling Enkidu the hero's servant or sidekick

Every retelling says it, and the Tablet XII appendix genuinely does make him a servant. The main poem commissions an equal.

wrong$$\text{Enkidu, the loyal servant of Gilgamesh}$$
right$$\text{Enkidu, made as a counterpart to Gilgamesh}$$
⚠ Reading the seven nights as the poem's verdict on sex or on culture

The scene is vivid and it invites a moral. The poem's own clause is an accounting statement, and quoting it beats supplying a moral.

wrong$$\text{the poem condemns what Shamhat does to him}$$
right$$\text{body diminished, understanding enlarged: a priced trade}$$

2.4Two refusals of limit: the forest and the goddess

The punishment in Tablet VII is assembled out of things the two of them chose to say out loud.

With an equal beside him Gilgamesh can finally go somewhere. The poem sends the pair out twice, and both trips end with a body.

RuleRule 2.3: the consequence is built out of speech
Conditions
  • Each stage is an utterance, not an accident: the proposal of the expedition, the refusal of Humbaba's plea, the refusal of Ishtar, the boast over the Bull.

  • The gods here react to completed acts and quote them back. The assembly in Tablet VII names the killings when it decides.

  • So a question about divine punishment is answerable from the text, with no theory about Mesopotamian religion attached.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Act, then the words that own the act,}\\&\text{then the sentence that quotes both back.}\end{aligned}}$$

Work out who said what, in order, and the punishment stops looking like weather. The poem lets both heroes commit themselves in speech before it takes anything from them.

The chain, link by link

The motive for the forest is a name. He proposes it in the language of reputation: he wants his name set where famous men's names are written, and tells Enkidu that if he falls he will at least have made a name. That substitute for immortality is the only one he has yet, and the ending withdraws it too.

The city's experts object and are overruled. The elders tell him he is young, that his heart carries him away, that Humbaba's roar is a flood and his mouth is fire. Then they let him go with advice. A poem wanting the expedition to look unavoidable would not stage the objection. It is on the tablet, for you to quote.

Humbaba asks for his life; Enkidu answers. In Tablet V the ogre pleads, offering timber. Gilgamesh hesitates. Enkidu tells him to finish it: leave him alive and the gods will hear of it. The friend argues for it, and the dying ogre curses them both. Two tablets later the assembly wants somebody; Enkidu's hand is up in the transcript.

The cedars come home as a door. They fell the forest, float the timber downriver, and the great cedar becomes a door for Enlil's temple at Nippur. Notice who is robbed: Humbaba was Enlil's appointed guardian of that forest, and the timber arrives as a gift to Enlil. The offering and the offence are made of the same wood.

Ishtar proposes, and is refused with a list. In Tablet VI she offers a chariot of lapis and gold, kings kneeling, prosperity for his herds. He answers with a catalogue of what happened to those who accepted:

  • Dumuzi, given yearly mourning
  • the bright allallu bird, its wing broken
  • the lion, caught in pits
  • the horse, given the whip and the goad
  • the herdsman, turned into a wolf and driven off by his own boys
  • her father's gardener, struck and transformed

It is not an insult about her character; it is an argument from precedent.

The Bull of Heaven, and the boast. Ishtar goes to Anu, who warns that the Bull means seven years of famine; she has the grain stored. Then:

  • the Bull comes down, its snorts open pits, and hundreds of the men of Uruk fall in
  • Enkidu takes it by the tail and Gilgamesh kills it
  • Enkidu tears off the haunch and throws it at the goddess with a taunt
  • the horns go up in the palace, and Gilgamesh asks the servant girls who is the finest of men

That last question is the last link in the chain.

Looks like this, but is not

It looks like divine caprice: gods who send bulls and famines, argue among themselves, and kill Enkidu with an illness nobody names. Written that way the plot becomes a story about arbitrary power, which is a reading with a long history.

Caprice would not need the transcript. The poem records an objection from the elders, a plea from Humbaba, an argument from Enkidu, a refusal with six precedents and a boast, and then has the assembly cite the killings. A capricious poem would skip the paperwork.

The catalogue of Ishtar's lovers as an argument, not an insult

A quiz asks why Gilgamesh lists Ishtar's former lovers instead of simply refusing, and what the cases have in common. Weak answers say he is being rude. The list has a pattern, and the pattern is the answer.

FindWhat the six cases share, and what that licenses him to conclude
Given
  • Dumuzi: yearly weeping decreed for him

  • The allallu bird: its wing broken, and it sits crying about the wing

  • The lion and the horse: pits, and the whip and the goad

  • The herdsman: turned into a wolf and chased off by his own boys

Solution

We look for a shared structure across the six cases instead of characterising the goddess, because a pattern is evidence and a character judgement is not.

Look for the shape rather than the cruelty

$$\text{Tablet VI, the catalogue}$$

Every one of them ends up permanently performing a ruined version of what he was. The bird admired for its colours now cries about its wing; the herdsman who kept animals is hunted by them.

That is far more specific than she hurts people. She converts a service into a lasting sign of that service, which is what an inscription does to a name.

Draw the inference the poem wants

So the refusal is a prediction: her love turns a man into a monument of his own usefulness. Gilgamesh, who went to the forest to make a name, is being offered exactly what he wanted, in its worst form.

Written that way the refusal connects Tablet VI back to the motive in Tablet II, and connection is what earns marks here.

Note what the argument costs him

The prediction is sound and it is also what gets the Bull sent. Being right about a goddess is not a defence against one.

Say that in a clause, or the answer turns into praise for the hero's cleverness.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Six precedents, one pattern: she turns a}\\&\text{lover into a permanent sign of his use.}\\&\text{So the refusal is a prediction.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Look for a counterexample inside the list: none of the six is simply killed, and even Dumuzi gets an annual rite, which is a form of permanence.

A list in this poem is usually an argument. Find the shared shape before you comment on the tone.

Why the assembly chooses Enkidu and not Gilgamesh

An exam question asks whether the choice in Tablet VII is fair. Fairness questions are traps unless you convert them into questions about the text's own reasoning, which here is unusually explicit.

FindWhat reasons the text gives, and what it pointedly does not give
Given
  • The charge named in the dream is the killing of Humbaba and of the Bull

  • Enlil wants a death; Shamash argues for the pair

  • Enkidu insisted on finishing Humbaba and threw the haunch

Solution

We convert a fairness question into a question about what reasons the text supplies, because that version is answerable from the tablet.

Read the dream as a transcript

$$\text{Tablet VII, the assembly}$$

Anu names the offences, Enlil demands a death, Shamash defends them by saying they acted at his word. The scene is staged as an argument with sides, not a verdict handed down, so the poem is telling you the outcome was contested.

Collect the reasons the text supplies

Enkidu argued for the killing, Enkidu threw the haunch, and Enkidu was made rather than born. Each is in the text and each is less than a proof.

The poem never says which reason decided it, and that silence is the finding: the death is a decision, not a calculation.

Say what the choice buys the poem

If Gilgamesh died the poem would end at Tablet VII. If nobody died the chain of speech was built for nothing.

Killing the counterpart teaches the survivor and keeps the poem alive.

Structural reasons are legitimate evidence provided you also show the textual ones, as in the step above.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The text gives reasons and refuses to rank}\\&\text{them. It is a decision, not a calculation.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Test the other assignment: put Gilgamesh under the sentence and Tablets VIII to XI have no subject, because nobody is left to mourn or to travel.

Say what the text refuses to say. A named silence scores better than a guess at the missing reason.

Checkpoint
§02.4 — what the six precedents share

Thirty seconds. Gilgamesh refuses Ishtar by listing six of her former lovers and what became of each.

Find(a) Pick the description of the pattern the six cases actually support.
Given
  • Dumuzi, a bird, a lion, a horse, a herdsman and a gardener

  • None of the six is simply killed

Hint 1/4

Do not ask what the six suffer. Ask what each becomes, and whether the new state has anything to do with the old one.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a list of more than three examples is an argument. Find the shared structure first.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the bird cries about its broken wing, the herdsman is hunted by his own animals, the horse famous in battle is given the whip and the goad.

Hint 4/4

Each is converted into a lasting version of what he was, which makes the refusal a prediction.

Show solution

We test three candidate patterns against all six cases rather than generalising from the first two, because a pattern that fails one case is not a pattern.

Test kills them, then converts them

Dumuzi gets annual weeping, the bird survives to cry, the herdsman survives as a wolf, so killing fails on three cases.

Bird to broken-winged mourner, herdsman to wolf, horse to beaten labourer, lover to annual rite: each new state is made out of the old one, and it fits all six.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{She converts each lover into a lasting}\\&\text{sign of what he was.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Apply it forwards: had he accepted, the king famous for his wall would become a permanent monument, which is close to what the poem gives him anyway.

A pattern claim is only as good as its worst case. Check the case that looks least like the others first.

⚠ Making the gods arbitrary because their motives are not stated

Enkidu dies of an unnamed illness and the assembly scene is short, so the punishment feels unmotivated. The poem records the whole chain of speech that leads to it.

wrong$$\text{the gods strike Enkidu down for no stated reason}$$
right$$\text{the assembly names the two killings when it decides}$$
⚠ Reading the catalogue in Tablet VI as abuse

It is a long list of bad outcomes addressed to a goddess, so it sounds like invective. It is structured as precedent.

wrong$$\text{he insults her by listing her failed affairs}$$
right$$\text{he argues from six precedents to a prediction}$$

2.5The death of Enkidu, and the change of subject

At Tablet VII the poem stops asking what a hero can do and starts asking what a man can keep.

The chain of speech has a verdict at the end of it, and the verdict changes what kind of poem this is.

RuleRule 2.4: the hinge, and how to show it
Conditions
  • Before Tablet VII the goals are external and reachable: a forest, an ogre, a bull, a name. Each is achieved.

  • After Tablet VIII the goal is not reachable by any means the poem has established. Strength, allies and courage all remain available and none of them help.

  • The hinge shows in small things too: what he wears, where he sleeps, who he talks to, and whether anyone goes with him.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Same hero, same strength, new question:}\\&\text{the second half asks what survives.}\end{aligned}}$$

Nothing about Gilgamesh's abilities changes when Enkidu dies. What changes is the kind of problem he faces, and the poem makes the point by leaving his abilities intact and useless.

Tablet VII and Tablet VIII in order

He dreams the assembly and wakes up sentenced. Enkidu's dream reports gods arguing about the killing of Humbaba and the Bull. Enlil wants a death. Shamash speaks for the pair and is overruled. Enkidu wakes and tells Gilgamesh, and from that moment the poem has a dying man in it.

He curses the door he made himself. His first speech after the sentence is addressed to the cedar door he and Gilgamesh cut for Enlil's temple, telling it he would have taken an axe to it had he known. A man cursing his own best work: the poem's way of showing grief going looking for a cause it can name.

He curses the hunter, then Shamhat, then takes one back. The order on the tablet:

  • he curses the trapper who found him at the waterhole
  • he curses Shamhat, who brought him into the city
  • Shamash answers from the sky and lists what she gave him: bread fit for a god, beer fit for a king, clothes, and a friend like Gilgamesh
  • Enkidu blesses her

The order matters more than either speech: the poem lets him argue, be answered, and change his mind.

The netherworld dream is not a punishment. A figure with a bird's face takes him to the house of dust: kings are servants, crowns piled up, Ereshkigal ruling, a scribe reading from a tablet. Nobody is tortured. That is the horror, because death here is dust and loss of rank rather than judgement, so nothing he achieved travels with him.

Twelve days, and a complaint about the manner of it. He lies sick for twelve days and says he is not dying the way he wanted. He is not falling in battle; he is wasting in a bed. For a hero that is the wrong death, and the wrong death is what the second half is about.

Tablet VIII: the lament, and a statue. Three moves, in order:

  • Gilgamesh calls on the elders, the roads, the pastures, the forest, the rivers and the animals to weep
  • he piles up grave goods and has a statue of Enkidu made in gold, with a chest of lapis
  • he tears off his fine clothes, puts on a lion skin, and leaves the city

The clothing is the hinge in one image: he puts on the animal Enkidu used to be.

Looks like this, but is not

After the death of a friend most stories do revenge. There is an obvious target, since a goddess asked for the Bull and a god insisted on the sentence, and the poem has shown that these two will attack anything.

The poem refuses the shape completely. Gilgamesh never moves against Ishtar or Enlil. He walks into the steppe dressed as an animal and starts asking a question. Revenge would keep the first half's assumptions in place, and the point of the hinge is that those assumptions stopped working.

Tablets I to VITablets VIII to XI

what he wants

a name that outlasts him

not to die

who is with him

Enkidu, an equal

nobody, and then hired help

where he is

Uruk and the forest

steppe, mountain, the edge of the sea

what he wears

the clothes of a king

the skin of a lion

who he asks

elders, his mother, the gods

a tavern-keeper, a ferryman, a survivor

what he gets

cedar, horns, a boast

two refusals and a repeated instruction

Read the rows downward and the argument is visible. Every resource he had still exists in the right column and none of it works. That is what a change of subject looks like when a poet is careful.

The curse he takes back, and why the order of speeches is the evidence

A short assignment asks what Enkidu's dying speeches tell us about the poem's view of civilisation. Most answers pick either the curse or the blessing. Both are on the tablet, in that order, with a god in between, and the order is the finding.

FindWhat the sequence says that neither speech says alone
Given
  • First he curses the cedar door, then the hunter, then Shamhat

  • Shamash answers and lists what Shamhat gave him

  • He then blesses Shamhat

Solution

We argue from the sequence rather than from either speech, because picking one means throwing away evidence sitting next to it.

Refuse to choose between the two speeches

$$\text{Tablet VII, the curses}$$

The curse alone gives you a poem that regrets civilisation; the blessing alone gives you one that endorses it. Both readings are available and both are half the evidence.

When two passages contradict each other and sit next to each other, the relation between them is usually the point.

Read what Shamash actually says

$$\text{Tablet VII, Shamash answers}$$

He does not deny the loss; he itemises the gains: bread, beer, clothes, a friend. It is the same ledger the poem used when Enkidu was first changed, brought back at the moment it has to be paid.

State the finding as a claim about the sequence

The poem lets the loss be spoken, lets it be answered, and lets the speaker revise. Civilisation is neither celebrated nor regretted; it is put on trial in front of the person who paid for it.

That claim can be disagreed with, it quotes three passages, and it explains why the blessing had to come second.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The order is the argument: loss spoken,}\\&\text{loss answered, speaker revises.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Reverse the sequence: blessing first and curse second would end on the loss and make Shamash's list worthless. The reading depends on the order.

Two speeches in a row are one piece of evidence. Quote the order rather than the half you prefer.

The lion skin: reading a change of clothes as an argument

An exam question quotes the moment in Tablet VIII when Gilgamesh tears off his fine clothes and puts on the pelt of a lion, and asks what it shows. Answering that he is grieving is true and is not yet a reading.

FindA claim about the gesture that a marker can credit
Given
  • He strips off his royal clothes and puts on a lion skin

  • He leaves Uruk and roams the steppe

  • Enkidu began the poem naked in the steppe among animals

Solution

We read the clothing against its own first appearance rather than against modern mourning customs, because the poem established the meaning itself in Tablet II.

Name what the clothes meant when they first appeared

$$\text{Tablet II, at the shepherds' camp}$$

Enkidu became human in stages, and being clothed was one of them, alongside bread, beer and oil. Clothes here mark the crossing from steppe to city, so taking them off runs the process backwards, item by item.

Say what the reversal claims

Gilgamesh puts on the animal his friend used to be, so the poem makes the survivor occupy the dead man's first condition. That is much stronger than sadness, and it sets up the geography of Tablets IX and X.

Check the claim against the ending

$$\text{Tablet XI, the return}$$

At Uta-napishti's house he is washed, his pelt is thrown into the sea and he is dressed for the journey home. The poem undoes the gesture deliberately, which confirms it was meant as a gesture.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{He puts on the animal his friend was.}\\&\text{The poem reverses it when he goes home.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check a different medium: the statue of Enkidu in gold and lapis is the opposite move, permanence in expensive materials. The two gestures frame what can be kept.

When a detail changes, find where it was introduced and where it is undone. Two anchors turn an observation into an argument.

Checkpoint
§02.5 — what changes at the hinge

Thirty seconds. Enkidu dies at the end of Tablet VII and Gilgamesh leaves Uruk in a lion skin. A classmate says the poem becomes a revenge story here.

Find(a) Pick the statement that best describes what actually changes.
Given
  • He never moves against Ishtar or Enlil

  • His strength, his allies and his courage all remain available

Hint 1/4

Ask what he still has and what he no longer has a use for. The hinge is not a loss of power.

Hint 2/4

Rule: when a poem keeps a hero's abilities and changes his problem, the change of problem is the event.

Hint 3/4

The data again: before Tablet VII the goals are a forest, an ogre, a bull and a name, and he gets all four. After it the goal is not dying, and nothing in his kit applies.

Hint 4/4

The question changes from what a hero can do to what a man can keep.

Show solution

We check whether the power is gone before asking what it achieves, because the two candidate descriptions differ only on that point.

Check whether the power is gone, then what it achieves

It is not gone: lions, stone figures, three hundred punting poles. Any answer that says he was weakened is contradicted by the next two tablets.

And it achieves nothing that matters. Smashing the stone crew is why the poles are needed, so force has become an expense rather than a method.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The problem changes and the hero does not.}\\&\text{Force becomes an overhead.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check from the ending: what he gets is a story and a wall, both products of work rather than force.

When a hero seems to change, ask whether the ability moved or the problem did. Here it is the problem.

⚠ Reading the second half as a revenge plot

It is the default shape after a friend dies, and the poem has shown these two attacking a god's guardian.

wrong$$\text{he sets out to avenge Enkidu on Ishtar}$$
right$$\text{he sets out to stop being mortal, and asks for help}$$
⚠ Treating the netherworld dream as a scene of punishment

A house of dust with a bird-faced escort reads like an underworld of torment. There is no torment in it, and the absence is the point.

wrong$$\text{the dead are punished in the house of dust}$$
right$$\text{the dead lose rank; kings serve and crowns are piled up}$$

2.6The road to Uta-napishti, and the Flood he tells

Two failures, of two different kinds, so the ending cannot be read as punishment for one fault.

He leaves in a lion skin with a question nobody in Uruk can answer, so the poem sends him to the only man who has an answer.

RuleRule 2.5: the poem fails him twice, deliberately
Conditions
  • Failure one is about what he is: told to stay awake seven days, he sleeps, and the bread counts the days for him.

  • Failure two is about luck: he gets the plant, and a snake takes it while he washes.

  • Uta-napishti's own exemption is a one-off, granted inside a story about a decision the gods regretted. It is not a method anyone can follow.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{One failure would name a fault.}\\&\text{Two failures of different kinds}\\&\text{name a condition instead.}\end{aligned}}$$

Had he only slept through the test, the poem would be about a man who was not good enough. Had he only lost the plant, it would be about bad luck. Both together make the result look like the way things are rather than the way he is.

The route, the speech, and the two tests

The road is built to be impassable, and he passes it. At Mount Mashu, the twin peaks that hold up the sky, a scorpion-man and his wife guard the gate of the sun's road:

  • they tell him nobody has done this, then open the gate
  • the path is twelve double-hours of complete darkness, and he walks it
  • he comes out in a garden where the bushes carry carnelian and lapis instead of fruit

The stretch proves no ordinary obstacle can stop him, so the failure at the end cannot be blamed on the journey.

Shiduri, and the version problem in one scene. A tavern-keeper at the edge of the sea bolts her door when she sees him. Two versions, two speeches:

  • Standard Version: she asks why his face is wasted, hears about Enkidu, and tells him about the crossing and Ur-shanabi
  • Old Babylonian Sippar tablet: the same character says the gods kept life for themselves, so he should fill his belly, be merry, wash, dress and hold a child's hand

That second speech is the most famous one connected with this poem, and the set text does not contain it.

Ur-shanabi, the stone crew, and three hundred poles. The ferryman's crew is stone figures, and Gilgamesh smashes them on sight. So he must cut three hundred punting poles and use each once: the Waters of Death may not be touched by hand. Comic and serious: the reflex destroyed the boat's engine, and from here force is an overhead.

The first answer is about destiny, not consolation. Before the Flood story Uta-napishti tells him the great gods fixed death and life together and withheld the length of a life. Nobody sees death; nobody is shown the day. It is the flattest statement of the problem, and it stands before the story, so the Flood arrives as evidence.

The Flood, told in the first person. Ea leaks the plan to a reed fence and a brick wall, so the god can say he told a wall and not a man. Then:

  • the boat is a sealed cube, seven decks, nine compartments
  • the storm runs six days and seven nights, the gods cower, and the boat grounds on Mount Nimush
  • a dove returns, a swallow returns, a raven does not; he sacrifices and the gods crowd the smell like flies
  • Enlil arrives furious that anyone lived, Ea argues him down, and Uta-napishti and his wife are given endless life at the mouth of the rivers

What the speech never supplies is a reason for the Flood.

Test one: bread counts the days. Told to stay awake seven nights, he is asleep at once. His wife bakes a loaf a day and lines them up; he wakes insisting he only dozed, and the first loaf is stone while the last is fresh. He cannot argue with bread. Sleep is the cheapest possible test: everyone loses nightly.

Test two: the plant, and the snake. As a parting gift he is told of a plant in the freshwater Deep:

  • he ties stones to his feet, dives, and gets it
  • he names it The Old Man Has Grown Young and plans to take it to the elders of Uruk
  • he stops to bathe, and a snake smells it and carries it off, shedding its skin as it goes

The snake gets the rejuvenation. He weeps, goes home, and tells the ferryman to look at the wall.

Looks like this, but is not

The shape is a quest: an impossible landscape crossed, a wise figure at the end of the world, a test, a magical object obtained. Every element of a reward narrative is present and in the usual order.

The object is obtained, then removed by an animal that is not even a character, and the test he fails is sleep. A reward narrative uses the test to prove the hero deserves the object; this one uses it to prove he is made of the wrong material, then loses the object casually so no blame lands on the failure.

Gilgamesh XIAtra-hasisGenesis 6 to 9

who warns the survivor

Ea speaks to the reed fence and the wall, so no oath is broken

Enki warns through the wall of the reed hut

God speaks to Noah directly

stated reason

none given in the speech; Enlil simply decides

human noise, after plague and famine failed

human wickedness and violence

the vessel

a cube, seven decks, nine compartments, sealed with pitch

a roofed boat; the tablet is damaged here

three hundred by fifty by thirty cubits, three decks

how long

six days and seven nights of storm

seven days and nights, where the tablet survives

forty days of rain, the waters prevailing far longer

landing and birds

Mount Nimush; dove, swallow, then a raven that stays away

not preserved

the mountains of Ararat; a raven first, then a dove three times

what the survivor gets

endless life, and exile to the mouth of the rivers

a reorganisation of human life, including limits on it

a , and the bow in the cloud. He stays mortal

what the story is for

to prove the one exemption cannot be repeated

to explain why people are mortal, noisy and limited in number

to establish a promise between God and everything alive

Read the last row first. The same events do three different jobs, which is why a comparison that only lists similarities scores badly. The row that pays best is the second: Tablet XI is the one version that declines to say why, and it declines because Gilgamesh is being told the rule has no appeal.

Why the test is sleep, and why bread is the evidence

A quiz asks why Uta-napishti sets a test about staying awake rather than a trial of strength, and why the loaves are in the story. Answers that say the test shows he is weak miss both halves.

FindWhat sleep proves that a fight would not, and what the bread adds
Given
  • The test: seven nights without sleep

  • He falls asleep at once and sleeps through all seven

  • A loaf is baked for each day and set beside him

  • He wakes and claims he barely closed his eyes

Solution

We ask what the test measures before what it means, because the choice of test is the authored decision.

Ask what the test is measuring

$$\text{Tablet XI, the test}$$

Strength and courage have been demonstrated for ten tablets, so testing them would measure nothing new. Sleep is the one thing he shares with everybody and controls not at all.

Sleep is also the standard image for death here, so losing to it nightly rehearses losing to death once. No amount of heroism helps.

Ask why the bread is needed

$$\text{Tablet XI, the loaves}$$

Because he denies it: he wakes and says he had only dozed. Without the loaves the scene ends in a disagreement between two men, and the poem wants a fact.

One hard as stone, one mouldy, one fresh: a row of days he cannot argue with. The poem is showing what proof looks like, which is what the prologue did with brickwork.

Put the halves together

The test picks the one weakness that cannot be trained away, and the bread makes the result undeniable to the person who most wants to deny it.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Sleep is the weakness he cannot train away.}\\&\text{The loaves make it impossible to deny.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Ask what another test would have done: wrestling the ferryman he would have won, and the refusal would look arbitrary. This test lets it come out of Gilgamesh.

When a story sets a specific test, ask what other test was possible. The road not taken shows what the author needed.

The raven, in Tablet XI and in Genesis, and why the order is reversed

A discussion asks you to compare the flood in Tablet XI with the one in Genesis. Listing similarities scores lowest, because the resemblance was established in 1872. Take one detail and make it work.

FindWhat the reversal of the bird order does in each story
Given
  • Tablet XI: dove out and back, swallow out and back, raven does not return

  • Genesis: raven first, then a dove three times, the third not returning

  • Both survivors sacrifice, and both have a divine reaction to the smell

Solution

We build the comparison out of one detail and verify on a second, rather than listing parallels, because the parallels are the famous part.

Get both orders right before interpreting either

$$\text{Tablet XI, the birds}$$

Dove, swallow, raven. The raven is last and its failure to return is the good news: dry land and carrion.

$$\text{Genesis 8}$$

Raven first, then a dove sent three times, returning with nothing, then with an olive leaf, then not at all. The dove carries the news.

Ask which bird is trusted

Tablet XI gives the decisive role to a scavenger and the sign is the absence of a bird. Genesis gives it to a dove and the sign is a leaf brought back, an object you can hold.

One story ends its experiment with something missing, the other with something present.

Attach the detail to the job each story does

Tablet XI is told to a man asking for an exemption and it ends by refusing him: the survivor is settled far away and the offer closed. Reading the world by absence suits that.

Genesis ends in a covenant with a visible sign, and a leaf in a beak is the first instalment of it. The bird detail does the same work as the ending in each case.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Tablet XI reads the world by an absence.}\\&\text{Genesis reads it by something brought back.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Verify on a second detail: Tablet XI gives no reason, Genesis gives wickedness and then a promise. Absence on one side, a stated relation on the other.

One detail worked through both stories beats a list of parallels. Get both orders right before you interpret either.

Checkpoint
§02.6 — why the poem fails him twice

Thirty seconds. He sleeps through the seven-night test, and then a snake takes the plant while he bathes. A classmate says the second failure is redundant.

Find(a) Pick the best reason the poem needs both failures.
Given
  • Failure one is about what he is: he cannot stay awake

  • Failure two is about chance: an animal takes the plant

Hint 1/4

Ask what the ending would mean if only one had happened. Do it for each separately.

Hint 2/4

Rule: one failure names a fault in the hero; two failures of different kinds name a condition no hero escapes.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the first is a weakness he cannot train away, the second an accident involving a snake that is not a character in the poem.

Hint 4/4

Together they block both consoling readings.

Show solution

We delete one failure at a time rather than arguing from the theme of mortality, because a deletion is a test that can come out either way.

Delete the snake, then the sleep test

Without the snake he comes home with a working plant and the elders grow young, so the poem is about a hero who failed one test and succeeded at the real thing.

Without the sleep test he is simply given the plant and loses it to an accident, so mortality becomes bad luck and a second attempt looks possible.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Each failure alone leaves a consoling}\\&\text{reading open. Together they close both.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Independent check: Uta-napishti is both an exception and an exile, so his case is no precedent either.

To show a part is load-bearing, remove it and read the ending again. What is left over is your argument.

⚠ Putting the carpe diem speech in the Standard Version's Tablet X

It is the most quoted passage connected with this poem and it is printed in the same volume, a few dozen pages from Tablet X.

wrong$$\text{in Tablet X Shiduri tells him to fill his belly}$$
right$$\text{on the Old Babylonian Sippar tablet she tells him that}$$
⚠ Treating Uta-napishti as a model to imitate

He is the one man who beat death, so he looks like proof that it can be beaten. His own account makes the grant a one-off and adds exile.

wrong$$\text{Uta-napishti shows that immortality is attainable}$$
right$$\text{his case is an exemption that is closed and removed}$$

2.7Writing the answer: from a quoted passage to a paragraph

Four moves turn a passage into a paragraph a marker can credit, and only one of the four is the poem's.

Everything above is readings. This is the part that converts a reading into marks, and the part most students never get taught.

MethodMethod 2.1: the evidence paragraph
Conditions
  • You have a passage in front of you, or one you can reconstruct closely enough to be honest about.

  • You have one sentence somebody could disagree with. If nobody could, you have a summary and you need to go back a step.

  • You can say something about the wording rather than the content: a verb form, a repetition, a word order, a list, a silence.

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Claim, then quotation with tablet and line,}\\&\text{then warrant about the wording,}\\&\text{then consequence.}\end{aligned}}$$

Say the arguable thing first. Put the poem's words next, with a reference. Then explain why those words and not others support what you said. Then say what your claim now lets you do. The third move is the one that is almost always missing.

The four moves, and what goes wrong at each

Move one, the claim. One sentence, present tense, about the poem rather than about you. The test is falsifiability: could a classmate disagree? The poem treats becoming human as an exchange passes. The poem explores the theme of civilisation does not, because nobody can disagree. Failed-claim words: explores, shows the importance of, is a timeless story about.

Move two, the quotation. Six to twenty words is the useful range: longer and the marker cannot see which part you meant, shorter and there is nothing to read.

  • give tablet and line, and name the translator once per answer
  • without the book, paraphrase and say you are paraphrasing: as Shamash reminds him, she gave him bread, beer, clothes and a friend

An honest paraphrase costs very little; a quotation invented under pressure costs the paragraph.

Move three, the warrant. This is where the marks are: it says why this wording supports the claim. It usually points at one of five things:

  • a verb form
  • an order of items
  • a repetition
  • a word doing double duty
  • something the text pointedly does not say

If your sentence after the quotation only restates the quotation, you have written a paraphrase.

Move four, the consequence. One sentence saying what the claim now lets you do: explain a later scene, rule out a common reading, transfer to the other text in the cluster. It is what makes a paragraph part of an argument, and in the course project it is what lets paragraphs be ordered.

What this course adds. Two things, and one instruction.

  • Version discipline, from earlier in this section: name the version when you quote, because half the famous lines are from the earlier epic.
  • Honesty about local variation: this course runs in many parallel sections with many instructors, and the binding General Syllabus sets the same four clusters for everyone while leaving some text choices to the section. It says flatly that other editions or translations will not be accepted.
  • So verify with your own instructor which edition and which quiz format you face, and never write in this course we read as if it were a fact about all sections.

One more thing markers notice. A paragraph that names the strongest objection to itself in a clause reads as confident, not weak. The servant reading of Enkidu is available in Tablet XII, and saying so while ruling it out of the main poem beats pretending it does not exist.

Looks like this, but is not

The five-paragraph essay template looks like the same advice: topic sentence, evidence, explanation, link. Students who learned it at school assume this is a renaming of it and skip the concept.

The template's explanation step permits restating the evidence, which is exactly the move that earns nothing here. A warrant has to be about wording, which means it can be wrong, which means it can be credited. The template also has no place for naming a version or an objection.

Turning the survey instruction into a paragraph, move by move

Take the passage from the prologue concept, the one telling the reader to climb the wall of Uruk and inspect the brickwork, and build the paragraph with each move labelled.

FindA finished paragraph, with the four moves visible
Given
  • The passage: the second-person survey instruction in Tablet I

  • The reading already established: the grammar makes the reader an inspector

  • The repetition at the end of Tablet XI

Solution

We label the moves while writing rather than after, because the warrant is the move that disappears when you write by ear.

Write the claim so that it could be wrong

Claim: the poem's measure of a life is work that can be inspected. Somebody could argue instead that its measure is fame, or knowledge, which is what makes this a claim.

Avoid the version that cannot fail: the poem explores the theme of legacy.

Place the quotation and cite it

Quotation: the prologue tells the reader to go up on the wall of Uruk and walk about, to inspect the foundation terrace and examine the brickwork, Tablet I, George. Short, mid-sentence, with a reference that locates it in the poem rather than in your copy.

Write the warrant about the wording

Warrant: every main verb is an imperative addressed to the reader, so the poem is not describing an achievement but asking to have one checked, and the objects it names are the foundation and the bricks, the parts a surveyor tests for durability rather than for beauty.

This is the sentence that could be attacked, and therefore the one that can be credited.

Close with the consequence

Consequence: this is why the same instruction, spoken to Ur-shanabi at the end of Tablet XI, does not read as defeat. He comes home with nothing portable, and the poem hands him back the one achievement it was willing to let us verify.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Claim, quotation with citation, warrant}\\&\text{about the verbs, consequence at Tablet XI.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Delete the warrant and read what is left: claim, quotation, consequence still sounds fluent, which is why weak answers get written.

Keep this paragraph as a template with the content stripped out. The shape transfers to every text in this course.

Repairing a weak answer without adding any new reading

Here is an answer of the kind that gets a low mark while feeling complete. The repair needs no extra knowledge, only the missing move.

FindA repaired paragraph, using only what is already there
Given
  • The weak answer: Gilgamesh is a timeless story about the fear of death. When Enkidu dies, Gilgamesh is very sad and goes on a long journey to find eternal life. He fails, which shows that all humans must die. This is still relevant today.

  • The available material: Tablet VIII, the lion skin; Tablet II, the camp

Solution

We repair by diagnosing against the four moves instead of rewriting freely, because free rewriting reproduces the same shape in better prose.

Diagnose in the order of the four moves

No claim, because nobody can disagree that the poem is about the fear of death. No quotation, so nothing to read.

No warrant. The consequence is about today rather than about the poem.

The factual content is correct throughout, which is why this kind of answer is hard to improve by revising.

Convert the theme into a claim

Instead of the fear of death: the poem measures grief by what a mourner is willing to stop being. Arguable, about the poem, and pointed at a specific scene.

Add the quotation and the warrant

$$\text{Tablet VIII, the lion skin}$$

He tears off his fine clothes and puts on the pelt of a lion. Warrant: clothing was one of the stages by which Enkidu was made human, alongside bread, beer and oil, so putting on a skin runs that process backwards and places the survivor in the dead man's first condition.

Replace the relevance sentence with a consequence

Instead of still relevant today: this is why the poem has him washed and dressed again at Uta-napishti's house in Tablet XI, so that his return is marked as a return.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Same facts, four moves added.}\\&\text{No new reading was required.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Count what was added: one arguable sentence, one detail, one sentence about wording, one link. No new material, which is why it is worth practising before an exam.

Use it as a checklist on your drafts: underline the claim, the quotation, the warrant and the consequence. Whatever you cannot underline is missing.

Checkpoint
§02.7 — which sentence is the warrant

Thirty seconds. A paragraph has four sentences. One of them is doing the work that earns the marks.

Find(a) Which sentence is the warrant?
Given
  • Sentence 1: the poem treats becoming human as an exchange rather than a gift.

  • Sentence 2: after seven nights with Shamhat the animals run from Enkidu, and the text says his body was diminished and his understanding enlarged, Tablet I.

  • Sentence 3: the two halves of that clause measure different things, one physical and one mental, so the line reports a conversion at a rate.

  • Sentence 4: this is why Shamash can answer his dying curse with a list of goods in Tablet VII.

Hint 1/4

Do not look for the sentence with the quotation. Look for the one that talks about the wording.

Hint 2/4

Rule: the warrant explains why this wording supports the claim. The quotation is the move before, the consequence the move after.

Hint 3/4

The data again: sentence 1 is arguable, 2 carries the words and the reference, 3 is about the structure of the clause, 4 reaches a later tablet.

Hint 4/4

Sentence 3 is the warrant.

Show solution

We remove each sentence in turn rather than matching sentences to the names of the four moves, because a missing warrant is the only removal you cannot hear.

Remove each sentence in turn

Remove 1 and there is nothing to support. Remove 2 and the reading has no text under it.

Remove 4 and the paragraph still stands, just isolated. Remove 3 and the paragraph still reads smoothly, which is the tell: the warrant is the move whose absence you cannot hear.

Confirm by what the sentence is about

Sentence 3 is about the clause: two halves, two different measures. It is not about Enkidu, it is about how the line is put together, and a sentence about that, placed after the quotation, is a warrant.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Sentence 3. It is about the wording,}\\&\text{and its absence is inaudible.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Try promoting sentence 4 into the warrant position. It explains a later scene rather than the wording, so it cannot do the job.

Removal is the cheapest test of a paragraph's structure. Run it on your own paragraphs before you hand them in.

⚠ Writing a claim nobody can disagree with

Safe claims feel professional and school essays reward them. Here they are unmarkable, because there is nothing to credit.

wrong$$\text{the poem explores the theme of mortality}$$
right$$\text{the poem measures grief by what a mourner stops being}$$
⚠ Restating the quotation and calling it analysis

The hardest habit to see in your own writing, because the paragraph still reads fluently without a warrant.

wrong$$\text{this shows that Enkidu has changed a great deal}$$
right$$\text{the clause pairs a physical loss with a mental gain}$$
Placing an unseen passage in under a minute

Any time a passage arrives without a tablet reference: a quiz hand-out, a slide, a question in a discussion section, a quotation in an essay.

  1. Test the reference

    A translator and a page cannot distinguish four texts, so you must place the passage from content.

  2. Look for an impossible fact

    A living Enkidu after Tablet VII, an Enkidu taking orders, a Bilgames or Huwawa spelling. Any one moves you out of the Standard Version.

  3. Match the scene against the version you know

    Find the same character in the Standard Version and ask what job they do there. Shiduri sends him to a ferryman; a Shiduri who gives life advice is Old Babylonian.

  4. Check the apparatus

    Brackets mean restored, dots mean lost, parentheses mean the translator's addition. Note anything your argument would lean on.

  5. Write the placement into your answer

    One clause: on the Old Babylonian Sippar tablet, or in the Tablet XII appendix. It is worth a mark and it protects everything after it.

Where it goes wrong
  • Placing by feel. The Old Babylonian material does not sound older in translation, because it is the same translator.

  • Assuming a footnote will warn you. The volume is an anthology; the texts just follow.

  • Refusing to commit. If the content cannot place it, say so; that is a finding and it beats a guess.

Building one paragraph that can be marked

Every short written answer, every paragraph of the course project, and the essay sections of the final.

  1. Write the arguable sentence

    Present tense, about the poem, capable of being wrong. If a classmate with the same book could not disagree, rewrite it.

  2. Choose six to twenty words of text

    Short enough that the marker sees which part you mean. Tablet and line; name the translator once per answer.

  3. Write the warrant about the wording

    Point at one thing: a verb form, an order of items, a repetition, a word doing two jobs, or a silence. Do not restate the quotation.

  4. Write the consequence

    What the claim now lets you do: explain a later scene, rule out a common reading, or carry the point to the other text in the cluster.

  5. Name the strongest objection in a clause

    Eight words conceding the best rival reading. It reads as control rather than doubt.

Where it goes wrong
  • A claim that cannot fail: explores, shows the importance of, is a timeless story about.

  • A warrant that is a paraphrase. The test is whether the sentence after the quotation could be attacked.

  • A consequence about the present day. It costs a line and earns nothing.

Comparing two tellings of the same story

The Flood against Atra-hasis or Genesis, the Standard Version against the Old Babylonian epic, and any comparison across two texts.

  1. Get both sequences right first

    Write the order of events out for both. Half of all comparison mistakes are errors of order rather than of interpretation.

  2. Pick one detail, not a theme

    A bird, a duration, a measurement, a stated reason. Themes produce lists of similarities, the lowest scoring form of this answer.

  3. Ask what the detail does in each story

    Not which is better or older. What job does it perform where it sits, and does that point the same way as the ending.

  4. Verify on a second detail

    Two independent details pointing the same way make an argument. If the second contradicts you, say so.

Where it goes wrong
  • Arguing about influence. Who borrowed from whom is a specialist question.

  • Listing similarities. The resemblance has been public since 1872.

  • Treating Genesis as the correct version that Tablet XI gets wrong.

Failure one: he sleeps through the test

Told to stay awake seven nights, he is asleep at once, and a loaf baked for each day sits beside him as a record. He wakes denying it and the bread contradicts him.

FindWhat kind of failure this is
Given
  • The test is set by the one man who beat death

  • The evidence is seven loaves in seven states

Solution

We locate the cause before naming the failure, because constitution and circumstance lead to different endings.

Locate the cause

Inside him: a need he cannot override. Nothing external interferes and nobody is at fault, so the failure is about what he is and no second attempt would change it.

Notice who delivers the verdict

The bread does, not the host. The poem arranges for the failure to be self-evident rather than announced.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{A failure of constitution.}\\&\text{No retry would help.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Imagine him trying again next week: same result, because the cause has not moved. A failure that survives a retry is a failure of kind.

Ask whether a retry would change anything. Here it would not, which is the whole job of the loaves.

Failure two: a snake takes the plant

He dives with stones on his feet, gets the plant, names it, and plans to take it to the elders of Uruk. He stops to bathe and a snake carries it off.

FindWhat kind of failure this is
Given
  • He obtains the object successfully

  • The loss happens while he washes, with no god involved

Solution

We read the tone as evidence rather than as decoration, because the casualness is what rules out a heroic near-miss.

Locate the cause

Outside him and contingent: a snake that is not a character takes the plant, and no divine decision is reported. So a second attempt is at least imaginable, which is exactly why the poem does not offer one.

Notice the tone

Almost casual, and the snake gets the rejuvenation. The poem declines to make the loss solemn.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{A failure of circumstance.}\\&\text{A retry is imaginable, and refused.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Imagine him diving again. He could, and the poem does not let him, so the refusal is the author's rather than the world's.

A retry is imaginable here and the poem declines to stage one. The refusal is the argument.

The first failure says he is the wrong kind of creature; the second says the world does not cooperate. Both in one tablet is how the poem prevents either excuse.

How to tell them apart

Ask whether a second attempt would change anything. If not, the failure is about his constitution. If it would, the poem is making a point about contingency, and you should ask why it refuses the retry.

Humbaba's offer, refused on Enkidu's advice

Cornered in Tablet V, Humbaba pleads and offers service and timber. Gilgamesh hesitates. Enkidu tells him to finish it, with a reason about the gods hearing of it. The dying ogre curses them both.

FindWho owns this refusal, and what it costs
Given
  • The offer is service and timber

  • The refusal is argued by Enkidu, not by Gilgamesh

Solution

We identify who speaks the reason rather than who strikes the blow, because the assembly two tablets later works by quoting speeches.

Identify the speaker of the reason

Gilgamesh wavers; Enkidu supplies the argument. The refusal is on Enkidu's account in the transcript, which matters two tablets later.

Track the cost

The curse lands on both, and the killing is one of the two charges the gods name, so the refusal is not free.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Enkidu owns the reason,}\\&\text{and the charge follows him.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check against Tablet VII: the assembly names the killing of Humbaba and Enlil asks for one death rather than two.

Ownership of a refusal follows the reason, not the weapon. Track the speaker.

Ishtar's offer, refused with six precedents

In Tablet VI she offers marriage, a chariot of lapis and gold, kings on their knees. Gilgamesh refuses by listing what became of her previous lovers. She goes to Anu and the Bull is sent.

FindWho owns this refusal, and what it costs
Given
  • The offer is marriage and wealth

  • The refusal is an argument from six named cases

Solution

We identify who speaks the reason rather than who suffers first, because the cost here lands somewhere other than the argument.

Identify the speaker of the reason

Gilgamesh argues it himself, at length, and the argument is sound. The refusal is fully his.

Track the cost

The city pays first, in the streets, and then Enkidu pays in Tablet VII for the boast that follows. The cost of a correct argument is borne by other people, which is one of the poem's flattest observations about kingship.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Gilgamesh owns the reason,}\\&\text{and the city pays first.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check the asymmetry against the first case: there the one who argued died. Here he survives and others do not.

The arguer survives and the city pays. Reasons and costs do not have to land on the same person.

Two offers refused, and the difference is who supplies the reason and who pays. Enkidu argues for the killing and is chosen for death; Gilgamesh argues against the goddess and the city is trampled.

How to tell them apart

For any refusal here, ask whose mouth the reason comes out of and whose body absorbs the consequence. When the two answers differ you are looking at the poem's argument about power.

Scaffolding comes off
The common skeleton
  1. Place the passage: which version, which tablet, and is anything restored or lost.

  2. State a claim that could be wrong: one sentence, present tense, about the poem.

  3. Quote six to twenty words and cite tablet and line.

  4. Write the warrant: why this wording rather than some other supports the claim.

  5. Close with a consequence, and concede the strongest rival reading in one clause.

1 · fully worked

Enkidu complains about the manner of his death, fully worked

Dying in Tablet VII, Enkidu says he is not falling in battle, and that the man who falls in battle is fortunate compared with him. Build the paragraph on that.

FindOne finished paragraph, with every step of the skeleton done
Given
  • The passage: Enkidu, sick for twelve days, on the death he is not getting

  • He has killed Humbaba and the Bull and has just dreamed the assembly

  • Every step is written out in the open

Solution

We choose a complaint rather than a lament, because a complaint contains an implied standard, and implied standards are easy to write warrants about.

Place the passage

$$\text{Tablet VII, Standard Version}$$

Between the dream of the assembly and the netherworld dream. The sentence has already been passed, so this is not a plea but a complaint about form.

State the claim

Claim: the poem lets its heroic value system speak at the moment it stops working. Arguable, because a reader could say the poem endorses the system and simply pities him.

Note that it is about the poem's arrangement, not Enkidu's feelings.

Quote and cite

$$\text{Tablet VII, George}$$

He says he is not dying like a man who falls in battle, and calls that man fortunate. Short, mid-sentence, tablet named.

Without the book, paraphrase and mark it as a paraphrase.

Write the warrant

Warrant: the comparison is with a man who dies violently, so Enkidu is ranking deaths rather than objecting to death, and the ranking is the one the expedition was conducted under. The wording detail is the comparative: not death is terrible but another death would have been better.

Consequence, and the objection

Consequence: this is why Tablet VIII spends its length on a lament and a statue rather than revenge. A poem sharing his ranking would have sent Gilgamesh to earn a better death; instead it sends him to avoid death.

Objection conceded in a clause: the poem never criticises the ranking explicitly, and a reader could hold that it shares his regret.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The poem gives the heroic ranking its best}\\&\text{line at the moment the ranking fails.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check against the other half: in Tablets IX to XI nobody suggests a better death is available. The value system appears once more, in the dying man's mouth, and then never.

Every rung below removes part of the scaffolding. The skeleton does not change.

2 · you write the reasoning

Easier than the one above: the claim and the passage are both given and all four moves are in order. Your job is only the reasoning. For each step, say why it is legitimate, then open the panel and compare.

  • Passage: at the shepherds' camp Enkidu does not know what bread is, is taught to eat and to drink beer, becomes cheerful, and is washed, oiled and clothed.
  • Claim: the poem treats becoming human as a sequence of ordinary lessons rather than a single moment of transformation.
  1. Step 1. Place it: Tablet II of the Standard Version, whose opening is restored from the Old Babylonian Pennsylvania tablet, after Shamhat and before the wrestling at the gate of Uruk.

    reasoning

    Placing it fixes which Enkidu we are discussing, and it forces the bracket convention: most of Tablet II is restored from the Old Babylonian Pennsylvania tablet, so say so when you quote it. The Sumerian poems have no shepherds' camp and Tablet XII has a different Enkidu, so the placement rules out two wrong conversations before they start.

  2. Step 2. Quote the items in the poem's order: bread, beer, cheerfulness, washing, oil, clothes.

    reasoning

    Order is evidence: bread before clothes, clothes last, so the poem builds a person from the inside out. Paraphrase without the order and you lose the only pattern in the passage.

  3. Step 3. Warrant: the passage is a list of separate lessons, each with its own verb, and a list is not a transformation scene.

    reasoning

    It is the warrant because it is about the form of the passage rather than its content. A list with one verb per item does something different from a scene in which a god touches somebody, and the difference is in the grammar.

  4. Step 4. Consequence: this is why Shamash can answer the dying curse in Tablet VII by naming the same items again.

    reasoning

    The consequence has to reach another passage, and this one reaches the moment where the bill is presented. Shamash names bread, beer, clothes and a friend, the same list, so the reading predicts a later scene.

3 · find the buried error

Harder than the rung above: nothing is given except a finished paragraph by a student who has read the poem and read it slightly wrong. Two of the four steps contain a mistake. Both are the kind made in real exams and neither is obvious.

The paragraph answers: what does the poem think becoming human costs?

  1. Step 1. Place it: the passage about Shamhat and the six days and seven nights is in Tablet I of the Standard Babylonian version, the eleven tablet poem translated by George.

  2. Step 2. Quote and cite: after the seven nights the animals flee from him, and in Tablet X the tavern-keeper Shiduri sums it up by telling him to fill his belly and be merry, since the gods kept life for themselves.

  3. Step 3. Warrant: the poem's verdict is negative. Enkidu curses Shamhat on his deathbed in Tablet VII and dies still cursing her, which shows the exchange was a bad bargain.

  4. Step 4. Consequence: so when Gilgamesh puts on a lion skin in Tablet VIII he is undoing the same process, item by item, and the poem lets him.

the two buried errors (2)
⚠ step 2

The advice to fill your belly is given to a Shiduri, but not the Shiduri of Tablet X in the Standard Version. It stands on the Old Babylonian Sippar tablet, so the step attributes an Old Babylonian passage to the set text.

It is the most quoted passage connected with this poem, it is printed in the same volume, and the character has the same name in both. Nothing in the reading experience warns you.

right

Write: on the Old Babylonian Sippar tablet Shiduri tells him to fill his belly, while in Tablet X she sends him on to the ferryman. One clause, and the step becomes a point about how the poem changed.

⚠ step 3

He does not die still cursing Shamhat. Shamash answers him, lists what she gave him, and Enkidu then blesses her. The step reports the first half of a two-part sequence as the whole thing.

The curse is vivid, long and first, so it sticks, and readers expect a dying man's last word on a subject to be his final one.

right

Write: he curses her, Shamash answers with the list, and he then blesses her, so the poem stages the loss, answers it, and lets the speaker revise. The warrant then becomes about the sequence.

4 · the bare problem
§02.7 — the bare problem

No scaffolding. One passage, one paragraph, in the form the skeleton gives. Give yourself twelve minutes and write it out in full, because this rung is about producing prose under time rather than recognising a good answer.

Find(a) Write one paragraph of four or five sentences on what the placement of this speech, before the Flood narrative rather than after it, does to the Flood narrative.
Given
  • The passage: Uta-napishti tells Gilgamesh that the great gods fixed death and life together when they made the world, and did not reveal the length of a life

  • It comes before the Flood story, not after it

  • Skeleton: place, claim, quote and cite, warrant, consequence with one concession

Hint 1/4

Do not start from what the speech says. Start from where it sits.

Hint 2/4

Rule: order is evidence. A general statement placed before an illustration turns the illustration into support; placed after, it would be a conclusion drawn from it.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the speech says death and life were fixed together and the span withheld. Then comes a long first-person Flood account, at the end of which one man is given endless life and moved far away.

Hint 4/4

The placement makes the Flood evidence for a rule already stated, so the exemption cannot be read as a precedent.

Show solution

We build the paragraph on where the speech sits rather than on what it says, because the content on its own would make the Flood look like a precedent.

The paragraph

Uta-napishti answers the request for immortality before he tells the story that might seem to grant it, and the order is the argument. He says the great gods established death along with life and kept the length of a life to themselves, Tablet XI, George, and only then begins the Flood account.

Because the rule is stated first, the narrative arrives as an illustration of it rather than a precedent against it, and the one grant of endless life inside the story reads as a decision taken once and removed from circulation by settling the survivor at the mouth of the rivers.

This is why the sleep test can follow immediately without feeling like a change of subject: Gilgamesh has been told the rule, and the loaves merely show him he is inside it.

A reader might object that an exemption is still an exemption, and it is, which is why the poem takes the trouble to place the survivor beyond reach.

What to check before handing it in

One tablet reference present. The claim is about arrangement and can be disputed.

There is a sentence about order rather than content. The last sentence concedes something.

Four checks, twenty seconds.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Order first, illustration second:}\\&\text{the Flood supports the rule.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Try the reverse order: if the Flood came first and the speech after, the speech would read as a conclusion drawn from one case, and a case with an exemption in it is a weak premise.

If you can produce this in twelve minutes you can produce it in an exam. The skeleton is the same for every passage in this course.

Full exam-style question

Full exam-style question: place a passage, then comment on itexam format

The shape most reading quizzes and the commentary part of the final take: an unseen passage, two parts, about twenty-five minutes. Part one is cheap, part two carries the marks.

  • On the paper, printed without a reference: a speaker tells the person in front of him to climb up on the wall, walk along it, inspect the foundation terrace and examine the brickwork, asking whether it is not all baked brick and whether seven sages did not lay its foundations.
  • (a) Place the passage: which text, where in it, and how you know.
  • (b) In one paragraph, say what the passage is doing at the point where it occurs.
FindA complete answer to both parts, at exam length
Given
  • An unseen passage with no reference

  • Part (a) placement, part (b) one paragraph of commentary

  • Twenty-five minutes, no book

Solution

We answer part (a) with the two features that identify the passage rather than everything we know about Tablet I, because placement is a cheap mark and overspending there is the commonest way to lose part (b).

Part (a): place it, and say how

$$\text{Tablet I, Standard Version}$$

The survey instruction from the prologue. Two features place it: second-person imperatives addressed to a reader, which only this opening uses, and the seven sages and baked brick, which belong to the description of Uruk's wall.

Add the complication yourself, because it is worth a mark: the same lines return near the end of Tablet XI, spoken to Ur-shanabi. With no surrounding context given, say the passage occurs twice and that the commentary holds for both.

One more clause: translated by George, since any wording you quote is that translator's.

Part (b): the claim

Claim: the passage offers a form of proof rather than a form of praise, which is what makes it usable at both ends of the poem. Arguable, because a reader could call the lines conventional city praise.

Part (b): the warrant

Every main verb is an order to the reader: go up, walk, inspect, examine. The passage does not assert that the wall is impressive; it instructs somebody to verify it, and the objects named are the foundation terrace and the brick, the parts a surveyor checks.

The rhetorical questions do the same from the other side: is it not baked brick, did seven sages not lay the foundations. Both invite confirmation rather than admiration.

Part (b): the consequence, and the concession

Because the proof is verifiable rather than reported, the poem can hand the same lines to Gilgamesh at the end, after the plant is lost and the test failed, without the ending collapsing. The one achievement that survives is the one we were asked to check.

Concession in a clause: praise of city walls is a convention, and a reader could take these lines as convention alone, but a convention that returns in the hero's own mouth at the close has been put to work.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Tablet I, and again Tablet XI: the poem}\\&\text{offers proof that can be checked, which is}\\&\text{why it survives the ending.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check against the clock: part (a) is four sentences and four minutes, part (b) five sentences and fifteen, with the warrant taking longest. If your warrant is shorter than your placement, the answer is upside down.

The shape transfers: two features that place it, one arguable claim, one warrant about wording, one consequence, one concession.

Practice

A · concept 3 questions
1§02.1 — standard does not mean original

A classmate's draft calls the eleven tablet poem the original Epic of Gilgamesh and the Old Babylonian tablets early drafts of it. The sentence sounds careful and is not.

Find
  1. (a) True or false?

  2. (b) Say in one sentence what standard actually refers to.

Given
  • The statement: the Standard Babylonian version is the original epic

  • The Old Babylonian epic is centuries earlier and has its own title

Hint 1/4

Ask what the word standard is doing. It is a claim about circulation, not priority.

Hint 2/4

Rule: version names here describe transmission. Earliest and most widely copied are different properties.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the Old Babylonian epic is Surpassing all other kings and is centuries older; the eleven tablet poem is He who saw the Deep.

Hint 4/4

False. Standard means standardised in antiquity, a fact about copying.

Show solution

We translate the technical label into the claim it makes before agreeing or disagreeing, because the claim is about copies and not about priority.

Translate the label

Standard means: this is the form in which the poem circulated in a stable text across many manuscripts. It is a statement about copies.

Original would be a statement about first composition, which nobody can make here.

Say what follows for an essay

Calling the Old Babylonian tablets drafts imports a modern model of authorship. They are an earlier work, not an earlier attempt at this one, so differences between versions become evidence about change over time.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{False. Standard is about copying,}\\&\text{not about priority.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Independent check: the two titles differ, and these poems are named by their first lines. Two titles means two poems, not two drafts of one.

Translate a label before you use it. Half the true-false questions in this course are label questions.

2§02.5 — the revenge that does not happen

A revision sheet in circulation says that after Enkidu's death Gilgamesh sets out to punish Ishtar, since she asked for the Bull. It is a reasonable guess about a poem nobody has read closely.

Find
  1. (a) True or false?

  2. (b) Name what he actually sets out to do, in six words or fewer.

Given
  • The statement: Gilgamesh sets out to avenge Enkidu on Ishtar

  • In Tablets IX to XI he travels to the edge of the world and speaks to three people

Hint 1/4

Ask who he goes to see after Tablet VIII, and what he asks each of them for.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a quest is defined by its request. Find the request and the goal is settled.

Hint 3/4

The data again: he asks a tavern-keeper for the road, a ferryman for a crossing, and a survivor of the Flood for the secret of endless life.

Hint 4/4

False. He sets out to stop being mortal, not to punish anyone.

Show solution

We list what he asks for, in order, rather than describing his mood, because requests are on the tablet and moods are inferred.

List the requests

Three named people, three requests, none mentioning a goddess or a grievance. The list settles the question without interpretation, and a quest question is usually answerable from the requests alone.

Say what the refusal of revenge buys

Revenge would keep the first half's assumption that a problem is something you attack, and Tablet VII has just shown that assumption producing the death. So the absence is structural rather than an oversight.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{False. He asks three people for a way}\\&\text{not to die.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Search the second half for a scene in which a god is opposed. There is none, and Shamash even helps him earlier. A revenge plot with no antagonist is not one.

Fix a quest by its requests. Three requests for a way not to die is not a revenge plot.

3§02.7 — warrant or paraphrase

Four sentences, each written immediately after the same quotation about Enkidu's body being diminished and his understanding enlarged. One is a warrant; the others are the three commonest substitutes for one.

Find(a) Which sentence is a warrant?
Given
  • The claim: the poem prices becoming human rather than praising it

  • The quotation: his body was diminished, his understanding enlarged, Tablet I

Hint 1/4

Do not pick the sentence that sounds most analytical. Pick the one about how the line is built.

Hint 2/4

Rule: if the sentence would survive the quotation being replaced by a different one, it is not a warrant.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the clause puts a physical loss and a mental gain in one breath, with two different kinds of measure.

Hint 4/4

The warrant is the sentence about the two halves measuring different things.

Show solution

We swap the quotation for a different one rather than hunting for warrant-sounding vocabulary, because only a real warrant breaks under the swap.

Apply the replacement test

Enkidu has changed a great deal survives any quotation about Enkidu. This shows the theme of civilisation survives any quotation at all.

The sentence about two kinds of measure breaks at once, which is the signature.

Say why the test works

A warrant is a claim about a specific piece of language, so anything that floats free of the language is summary or theme, and neither can be credited.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The sentence about two kinds of measure.}\\&\text{It breaks if the quotation changes.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Count what each sentence adds. The warrant adds an observation that was not in the quotation, that the two halves are incommensurable. The others add nothing.

A sentence that survives any quotation is not doing warrant work. Swap and see.

B · computation 5 questions
1§02.1 — place three passages from their cues

Three passages arrive with no references. Each has at least one cue that places it, and one cannot be placed exactly from the cue it gives, which is itself the right answer for that item.

Find
  1. (a) Place passage one and name the cue.

  2. (b) Place passage two as far as the cue allows, and say what a second cue would have to be.

  3. (c) Place passage three and name the cue.

Given
  • One: Bilgames sends envoys back to Akka of Kish and the city refuses to submit

  • Two: Huwawa, cornered in the forest, offers to become a servant and to supply timber

  • Three: a woman bakes a loaf for each day and lines them up beside a sleeping man

Hint 1/4

For each passage, find the one word or fact that could not appear in the other texts.

Hint 2/4

Rule: names change with the language and events change with the version. Use a name cue first, then an event cue.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Bilgames is the Sumerian form of the hero's name; Huwawa is the Sumerian and Old Babylonian form of the ogre's, while the Standard Version writes Humbaba; the loaves belong to the sleep test.

Hint 4/4

One is Sumerian, two is Sumerian or Old Babylonian and needs a second cue, three is Tablet XI.

Show solution

We use name forms before content because a spelling is a single fact that cannot be misremembered.

A name form that only one language uses

$$\text{Bilgames}$$

The Sumerian poems use this form throughout; the Akkadian epic uses Gilgamesh. One word places it, and the content confirms it: no Akka of Kish appears in the Akkadian epic in any version.

A cue that narrows without deciding

$$\text{Huwawa}$$

Both the Sumerian poems and the Old Babylonian epic use Huwawa; the Standard Version writes Humbaba. So the passage is not from the set text, which is already useful.

To go further you need a second cue, such as whether Enkidu argues for finishing him. Saying what cue you would need is the honest answer and it earns credit.

An event that exists in only one place

$$\text{the seven loaves}$$

The sleep test with a loaf per day belongs to Tablet XI and to no other text in the volume. Event cues are safer than atmosphere.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Sumerian; Sumerian or Old Babylonian;}\\&\text{Tablet XI of the Standard Version.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Try to break each placement: the surviving Old Babylonian material has no sleep test, and passage one cannot be Akkadian with that name form.

Keep a list of diagnostic names: Bilgames against Gilgamesh, Huwawa against Humbaba, Enki against Ea, Inanna against Ishtar.

2§02.2 — the strongest evidence about the ending

An essay has to argue that the ending is a return rather than a defeat. Four pieces of evidence are available and they are not equally strong.

Find(a) Which is the strongest single piece of evidence for the return reading?
Given
  • He loses the plant to a snake and weeps

  • He is washed and dressed properly before leaving Uta-napishti

  • His closing speech repeats the prologue's survey instruction

  • The prologue already claimed he brought back a tale from before the Flood

Hint 1/4

Ask which of the four the opposite reading cannot also use.

Hint 2/4

Rule: the strongest evidence is the piece only your reading can explain. Test each item against the defeat reading.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the tears and the loss fit defeat comfortably; the washing is suggestive; the repeated instruction puts the poem's opening words in the hero's mouth after everything is lost.

Hint 4/4

The repetition is strongest, because a defeated man speaking the poem's own opening lines is hard for the defeat reading to absorb.

Show solution

We hand each item to the rival reading rather than ranking by how striking it is, because the useful item is the one the rival cannot absorb.

Give each item to the rival reading

The tears and the lost plant fit defeat perfectly, so they are worthless to us, and the prologue's claim about a tale fits it too, since a consolation prize is still a loss. The washing is better but could be a courtesy.

Test the repetition

$$\text{Tablet XI, closing lines}$$

The defeat reading has to explain why a broken man is given the narrator's own first words, and the best it can do is call the repetition ironic. Evidence that forces the other side into irony is what you lead with.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The closing repetition.}\\&\text{The rival reading has to call it ironic.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Notice that the strongest item is also the only one about the poem's structure rather than the hero's mood. Structural evidence usually outranks emotional evidence here.

Rank evidence by what it costs your opponent. The item they have to call ironic is the one to use.

3§02.3 — put five moments on the two arcs

The two arcs are Enkidu moving from the steppe into the city, and Gilgamesh moving from the city into the steppe. Five moments are listed out of order.

Find
  1. (a) Assign each moment to an arc and order them within it.

  2. (b) Say which tablet the handover between the two arcs happens at, and why that is the point.

Given
  • One: Enkidu fills in the hunter's pits and frees the trapped animals

  • Two: Gilgamesh tears off his clothes and puts on a lion skin

  • Three: Enkidu learns to eat bread and drink beer at the shepherds' camp

  • Four: Gilgamesh is washed and dressed for the journey home

  • Five: Enkidu blocks the way to a wedding in Uruk and wrestles the king

Hint 1/4

Do not sort by tablet number. Sort by which direction the person is travelling.

Hint 2/4

Rule: each arc runs between steppe and city, and each moment is a position on one of them. Clothing, food and company are the markers.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Enkidu's arc runs pits, then bread and beer, then the gateway of Uruk. Gilgamesh's runs lion skin, then washed and dressed again.

Hint 4/4

Enkidu: one, three, five. Gilgamesh: two, four. The handover is at Tablet VII.

Show solution

We sort by direction rather than chronology, because the poem interleaves the arcs and a chronological list hides the pattern.

Sort by direction first

Moments one, three and five move towards the city; two and four belong to a man leaving and returning. Sorting by direction before tablet number is the trick, because tablet numbers interleave the arcs and hide the pattern.

Order within each arc using the markers

Enkidu: no clothes and animals for company, then bread and beer and human company, then a fight with the king. Gilgamesh: royal clothes off and a skin on, then washed and dressed at the far end.

The same markers, in reverse.

Locate the handover

$$\text{Tablet VII into VIII}$$

Enkidu dies at the city end of his arc, fully human, and Gilgamesh immediately puts on an animal skin and leaves. The handover is explicit in the clothing, so the handover is the death, not the meeting in Tablet II.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Enkidu: 1, 3, 5. Gilgamesh: 2, 4.}\\&\text{The handover is the death, not the meeting.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Look for a moment belonging to both arcs. The wrestling match is the only candidate, and nobody changes direction there, which confirms the meeting is not the handover.

Sort by direction before tablet number whenever two arcs are interleaved. The handover is where one line ends and the other turns.

4§02.4 — reconstruct the chain of speech

The punishment in Tablet VII is built out of speech. Reconstruct the chain: for each link, name who speaks, what they say, and what it commits them to.

Find
  1. (a) Write the chain as four links, each with a speaker.

  2. (b) Say which link the assembly names when it decides, and which speaker that implicates.

Given
  • The proposal of the expedition to the Cedar Forest

  • The response of the elders of Uruk

  • Humbaba cornered, and what Enkidu says about him

  • Ishtar's offer, the refusal, and the haunch thrown after the Bull

Hint 1/4

Go through the tablets looking only for speech that commits somebody to something.

Hint 2/4

Rule: the gods here react to completed acts and quote them, so the links that matter are the ones that can be quoted back.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Gilgamesh proposes the expedition to make a name and overrules the elders; Humbaba pleads and Enkidu argues for finishing him; Gilgamesh refuses Ishtar with six precedents; Enkidu throws the haunch with a taunt.

Hint 4/4

The assembly names the killing of Humbaba and of the Bull, and Enkidu is the speaker attached to both.

Show solution

We keep only the links with speakers because the assembly's method is to quote, and evidence matching the court's method is what gets admitted.

Keep only the links with a speaker

The felling of the cedars is an action without a speech, so it is not a link even though it is part of the offence. Four links with speakers is what the question asks for; listing everything that happens is the slow way to a lower mark.

Write each link as speaker plus commitment

$$\text{Tablet II, the proposal}$$

Gilgamesh: let me make a name. Commits him to an errand of reputation and to overruling the city's experts.

$$\text{Tablet V, the plea}$$

Enkidu: finish him, or the gods will hear of it. Commits him to the killing by argument, not just by presence.

$$\text{Tablet VI, refusal and taunt}$$

Gilgamesh: six precedents, so no. Enkidu, throwing the haunch: this too, if I could reach you.

Commits both, differently.

Read the assembly back onto the chain

$$\text{Tablet VII, the dream}$$

The offences named are the killing of Humbaba and of the Bull. Enkidu has a speech attached to each; Gilgamesh only to the second.

That is as far as the text goes, and saying so is part of the answer.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Four links, four speakers.}\\&\text{Enkidu has a speech at both named offences.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Build the same chain without speech, using only actions: you get two killings and a felling, and no way to explain why one of the two men is chosen.

Build evidence in the form the court uses. This court quotes, so keep the links that have a speaker.

5§02.6 — fill three cells of the comparison

Part of the flood comparison is below with three cells missing. Fill them, then do the part that earns marks: say what one of the differences does inside its own story.

Find
  1. (a) Fill the three missing cells.

  2. (b) Take the reason row and say in two sentences what that difference does inside each story.

Given
  • Who warns the survivor. Tablet XI: Ea speaks to the reed fence and the wall. Genesis: God speaks to Noah directly.

  • Stated reason. Tablet XI: missing. Atra-hasis: human noise, after plague and famine failed. Genesis: human wickedness.

  • The birds. Tablet XI: dove, swallow, then a raven that does not return. Genesis: missing.

  • What the survivor gets. Tablet XI: endless life and settlement at the mouth of the rivers. Genesis: missing.

Hint 1/4

Fill the cells from the two narratives, not from a general sense that they are similar.

Hint 2/4

Rule for comparisons: get both sequences right, then pick one detail rather than a theme.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Tablet XI has Uta-napishti report Enlil's decision with no motive given; Genesis sends a raven first and then a dove three times; Noah receives a covenant with a sign and stays mortal.

Hint 4/4

Tablet XI gives no reason; Genesis sends raven then dove three times; Noah gets a covenant and remains mortal.

Show solution

We interpret the motive row rather than the measurements, because an absence in one version and a presence in two is a usable asymmetry.

Fill the cells precisely

Tablet XI: Uta-napishti reports that the great gods decided and does not say why. Write that as an absence, not as unknown.

Genesis: raven first, then the dove three times; a promise and a sign, and no immortality.

Choose the row that carries weight

The bird row is vivid and the motive row is structural. Pick the motive row, because an absence needs explaining and an explained absence is an argument.

A comparison built on boat measurements has nowhere to go.

Say what the difference does in each

In Tablet XI the story is addressed to a petitioner, so a stated reason would open the question of whether it applies to him; silence closes the appeal. In Genesis the reason is the first half of a transaction whose second half is the covenant.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{No reason, raven then dove, covenant}\\&\text{and mortality. Then use the motive row.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Apply the reasoning to Atra-hasis: its motive is noise and what follows is a reorganisation of human life with limits built in, so the motive is load-bearing there too. Two of three need it, and the one that withholds it is the one told to a petitioner.

In comparison questions, prefer a row where one column is empty. Absences are the cheapest strong evidence available.

C · exam level 3 questions
1§02.2 — does the poem keep the prologue's promise

Exam length, one paragraph, fifteen minutes. The prologue credits Gilgamesh with seeing what was secret, coming a long road, bringing back a tale of the time before the Flood, and setting it down in writing. The narrative ends with him empty-handed at a wall.

Find(a) In one paragraph, say whether the poem delivers on the prologue's claim, and what the answer depends on.
Given
  • The prologue's claim, in Tablet I

  • The ending, in Tablet XI, with the plant lost and the test failed

  • Uta-napishti's Flood account is told to him in the first person

Hint 1/4

Do not answer yes or no at once. Ask what the claim promised, item by item, then check each against the ending.

Hint 2/4

Rule: when a text makes a claim about its own hero, treat it as a checklist and audit it. The interesting answers are partial.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the prologue promises secret knowledge, a long road, a tale of before the Flood, and a written record. The ending gives him no plant and no life, and Tablet XI has just given him a first-hand Flood narrative.

Hint 4/4

It delivers on the knowledge and the record and withholds the thing he wanted.

Show solution

We audit rather than answer, because the promise has four parts and three are kept. A yes or no has to suppress evidence either way.

Split the promise into items

$$\text{Tablet I, the prologue}$$

Secret knowledge; a long and exhausting road; a tale of the time before the Flood; the whole set down in writing. Four items, each checkable.

Splitting is what makes the question answerable in fifteen minutes.

Check each item

$$\text{Tablets IX to XI}$$

The road is delivered in full, and so is the Flood narrative, told by the one survivor. Secret knowledge is delivered too, as the rule about fixed destinies.

$$\text{Tablet XI, the two failures}$$

What is not delivered is anything he can use. The prologue never promised that, which is the interesting part.

State the claim and concede

Claim: the prologue promises knowledge and the hero wanted an exemption, so the poem keeps the promise it made rather than the one he was pursuing. Warrant: the prologue's verbs are about seeing, coming back and writing, not about obtaining.

Concession in a clause: a reader may hold that knowledge without relief is a thin achievement, and the poem does nothing to argue otherwise.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The poem keeps the promise it made,}\\&\text{not the one the hero was chasing.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Read the prologue's verbs again: saw, discovered, brought back, set down. Not one is a verb of possession, so the audit and the grammar agree.

Any does the text do what it says question: split the claim into items first. The mixed result is nearly always the answer.

2§02.4 — divine punishment, best supported statement

Exam level. Four statements about how punishment works in this poem, all four of the kind that appears in essays. Only one can be supported without importing anything.

Find(a) Which statement is best supported by the text?
Given
  • The assembly in Tablet VII names the killing of Humbaba and of the Bull

  • Shamash defends the pair and is overruled by Enlil

  • The elders of Uruk had objected before the expedition started

Hint 1/4

Test each statement by asking what passage you would quote for it.

Hint 2/4

Rule: the gods here react to completed acts and cite them. Statements needing a hidden divine plan need evidence the text does not supply.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the offences are named in the dream, the defence is offered and rejected, and no reason is given for choosing Enkidu over Gilgamesh.

Hint 4/4

The supportable statement is the one about recording, citing and declining to rank.

Show solution

We name the passage we would quote for each option before choosing, because an option with no passage behind it cannot be defended in a paragraph.

Try to quote for the three weak options

Arbitrary needs a passage showing no reason given, and the dream gives reasons. Punished for being made needs a line saying so, and there is none.

Punished hubris needs the concept in the assembly's mouth, and what is there is a list of two killings.

Quote for the surviving option

$$\text{Tablet VII, the dream}$$

Anu names the offences, Enlil asks for a death, Shamash defends them, and no reason is given for the selection. Every clause maps onto something in the scene, the negative clause included.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The poem records, cites, and declines}\\&\text{to rank. All of that is quotable.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

The same test elsewhere agrees: the objection, the plea and the haunch are on the record and none is evaluated by a narrator.

Choose the claim you can quote for, not the one you believe. The quotation is what earns the mark.

3§02.7 — choose the opening claim

Exam level. The question on the paper is: discuss the role of speech in bringing about Enkidu's death. Three of the four candidate openings will produce an answer that cannot be marked well no matter how good the rest is.

Find(a) Which opening sentence gives the answer the best chance?
Given
  • The question: discuss the role of speech in bringing about Enkidu's death

  • Twenty-five minutes, no book

  • You remember the assembly scene, Humbaba's plea and the haunch

Hint 1/4

Test each candidate by asking what the second sentence would have to be. A claim that does not force a second sentence is not a claim.

Hint 2/4

Rule: an opening claim has to be arguable, about the poem, and narrow enough to be supported by two or three passages.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the material you have is the assembly scene, the plea and Enkidu's argument, and the haunch with its taunt.

Hint 4/4

Pick the sentence that commits you to the transcript you can actually quote.

Show solution

We ask what each opening obliges us to do rather than which one sounds best, because an opening with no obligation leaves the paragraph nowhere to go.

Ask what each opening obliges you to do

Speech plays an important role obliges nothing. Speech is central to all epic obliges you to know about all epic.

The gods are unjust obliges you to argue about justice, which the text declines to discuss.

Check the survivor against your material

Built out of things they chose to say obliges you to produce the utterances, and you remember three: Enkidu's argument at the plea, the taunt with the haunch, and the assembly naming the killings.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Pick the opening that obliges you to use}\\&\text{the evidence you actually have.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Write the second sentence in your head for each candidate. For three of them it is another generality, which is the symptom the test catches.

A good opening creates a debt you can pay with the evidence you have. Check the debt before you write.

D · interleaved 3 questions
1§02.0 — mixed set, no type given

The opening cluster put a claim on the table: culture is made rather than inherited, and somebody pays for the making. Here is a passage. Decide for yourself what kind of question this is before you answer it.

Find(a) Which statement does the passage support best?
Given
  • At the shepherds' camp Enkidu is taught to eat bread, learns to drink beer, becomes cheerful, and is washed, rubbed with oil and dressed

  • Before this he ran with the gazelles and filled in the hunter's pits

  • Afterwards the animals will not come near him

Hint 1/4

Ask what the passage is made of, structurally, before you ask what it means.

Hint 2/4

Rule: a list of separate lessons does something different from a single transformation, and the poem chose the list.

Hint 3/4

The data again: bread, beer, cheerfulness, washing, oil and clothes, each with its own verb, in that order, and the loss of the animals reported separately.

Hint 4/4

Culture arrives as ordinary lessons with a bill attached, and the bill is the animals.

Show solution

We describe the structure of the passage before interpreting it, because the list form is what separates the two strongest options.

Describe the structure

It is a list, not a transformation scene. Nobody touches him, no god intervenes, and each item has its own small action.

Bread comes first and clothes last, so the poem builds a person from the inside out.

Attach the cost

The animals leaving is not part of the list; it is what the list costs, and the poem keeps the two separate, which makes the accounting visible. So the cluster's claim is not imported here; the passage states both halves.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Ordinary lessons, listed, with a bill}\\&\text{reported separately.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

The same ledger reappears in Tablet VII, where Shamash lists bread, beer, clothes and a friend as what Shamhat gave him: the same items, once as a purchase and once as a defence.

When a cluster's claim and a passage meet, let the passage state both halves. An imported claim is visible.

2§02.0 — mixed set, no type given

Three stories about a flood and three different jobs. One is your set text, one is another Akkadian poem, and one is not on your reading list at all.

Find
  1. (a) For each of the three, say in one sentence what the flood is needed for.

  2. (b) Say which of the three could not do without its stated motive, and why.

Given
  • Tablet XI: told in the first person to a man who has come asking for endless life, and no reason for the flood is given

  • Atra-hasis: the flood is the last of several attempts to reduce a noisy human population, and what follows includes limits on human life

  • Genesis 6 to 9: the flood answers human wickedness, and what follows is a covenant with a visible sign

Hint 1/4

Do not compare the floods. Compare what happens immediately after each one.

Hint 2/4

Rule for comparisons: pick a structural feature, ask what job it does where it sits, and check whether it points the same way as the ending.

Hint 3/4

The data again: Tablet XI ends with one exemption placed out of reach; Atra-hasis with a reorganisation of human life; Genesis with a promise and a sign.

Hint 4/4

Two of the three need the motive because it is half of a transaction; Tablet XI withholds it because it is answering a petitioner.

Show solution

We work backwards from the endings because that is where a story declares its purpose.

Read the three endings

Tablet XI: the survivor is given endless life and settled at the mouth of the rivers, far from anyone. Atra-hasis: human life is reorganised with limits.

Genesis: a covenant and a bow in the cloud.

Work backwards to the purpose

An ending that removes the exception needs a story proving exceptions are not repeatable. An ending that limits human life needs a story about a population problem.

An ending that promises needs a story about an offence.

Answer the second part

Genesis cannot do without the motive, because a promise not to do it again is unintelligible unless we know why it was done. Tablet XI gains by silence, since a stated reason invites the petitioner to argue that it does not apply to him.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Proof, explanation, promise.}\\&\text{Genesis needs its motive most.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check the silence claim: Uta-napishti's speech just before the account says the gods fixed death and life and kept the span to themselves. A speech that begins by refusing to reveal is consistent with a narrative that refuses to explain.

For comparison across traditions, read the endings first. Beginnings look similar far more often than endings do.

3§02.0 — mixed set, no type given

Twenty minutes, one paragraph. This question crosses the first cluster and this one, and it does not tell you which concept to use. Choose your own passage.

Find(a) Choose one passage and write a paragraph arguing what this poem adds to the claim that culture is made and paid for.
Given
  • The first cluster's claim: culture is made, and the making has a price

  • Available passages: the camp scene in Tablet II, the cedar door in Tablets V and VII, the statue in Tablet VIII, the wall in Tablets I and XI

  • The skeleton: place, claim, quote and cite, warrant about the wording, consequence with one conceded objection

Hint 1/4

Choose the passage that gives you a wording detail, not the one with the most famous content. You need something to write a warrant about.

Hint 2/4

Rule: the paragraph needs four moves, and the warrant has to be about how the passage is put together.

Hint 3/4

The data again: the camp scene is a list with one verb per item; the cedar door is an object cursed by the man who made it; the statue is made of two named materials; the wall is described with imperatives.

Hint 4/4

Any of the four works. The cedar door is strongest, because it is the only case where the maker turns on his own work.

Show solution

We choose the passage that extends the cluster's claim rather than one that illustrates it, because illustration is what every other answer in the room will be doing.

The paragraph

This poem adds a case the general claim does not cover: a made thing can be repudiated by its maker, out loud, with nobody contradicting him.

Dying under a sentence he has just dreamed, Enkidu addresses the cedar door he and Gilgamesh cut for Enlil's temple and tells it he would have taken an axe to it, Tablet VII, George.

The address is the evidence: he speaks to the door in the second person, as to a party in a dispute, which makes his own best work into something that can be held responsible.

Culture here is therefore not simply a purchase with a price, as the cluster's opening claim has it, but a relation that can go bad from the maker's side.

A reader might object that this is only a dying man's confusion, and the poem allows that reading, though it then has Shamash answer the next curse and not this one.

Why this passage beats the more famous ones

The camp scene and the wall are both about acquisition, which is the part of the claim the first cluster already made. The door is the one passage where the transaction is disowned, and choosing a passage that extends the claim rather than illustrating it is most of what separates a strong answer from a competent one.

Answer $$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{The door is the one case where the maker}\\&\text{turns on the thing he made.}\end{aligned}}$$
Check

Check the concession: Shamash does answer Enkidu's curse on Shamhat and does not answer the curse on the door. The asymmetry is real, so the concession is genuine rather than decorative.

When a question crosses two clusters, look for the passage that complicates the earlier claim. Agreement is cheap and reads as revision notes.

Mistake ledger (18 entries)
⚠ Citing a page in an anthology as if it were a single text

Four texts share one page sequence, so a page number identifies your printing.

wrong$$\text{Gilgamesh, trans. George, p. 124}$$
right$$\text{Gilgamesh, OB Sippar tablet, trans. George}$$
⚠ Calling the Standard Version the original

Standard means widely copied. The Old Babylonian epic is centuries earlier.

wrong$$\text{the original Epic of Gilgamesh, Tablet X}$$
right$$\text{the Standard Babylonian version, Tablet X}$$
⚠ Treating the prologue as a summary you can skip

It makes a checkable claim, and Tablet XI repeats its instruction.

wrong$$\text{the poem really begins when Enkidu is made}$$
right$$\text{the prologue states the claim the ending tests}$$
⚠ Making the two-thirds fraction a biology problem

Used once, never computed with. It marks him as neither god nor ordinary man.

wrong$$\text{two thirds plus one third is impossible for two parents}$$
right$$\text{the fraction ranks him outside both categories}$$
⚠ Calling Enkidu the hero's servant or sidekick

The gods are asked for a match and the fight ends level. The servant is in Tablet XII.

wrong$$\text{Enkidu, the loyal servant of Gilgamesh}$$
right$$\text{Enkidu, made as a counterpart to Gilgamesh}$$
⚠ Reading the seven nights as the poem's verdict on sex or on culture

The poem supplies its own clause, and it is an accounting statement.

wrong$$\text{the poem condemns what Shamhat does to him}$$
right$$\text{body diminished, understanding enlarged: a priced trade}$$
⚠ Making the gods arbitrary because their motives are not stated

The poem records the whole transcript and then has the assembly cite the killings.

wrong$$\text{the gods strike Enkidu down for no stated reason}$$
right$$\text{the assembly names the two killings when it decides}$$
⚠ Reading the catalogue in Tablet VI as abuse

All six share a structure: each lover becomes a lasting version of what he was.

wrong$$\text{he insults her by listing her failed affairs}$$
right$$\text{he argues from six precedents to a prediction}$$
⚠ Reading the second half as a revenge plot

Three requests, none about a goddess, and no god is opposed after Tablet VII.

wrong$$\text{he sets out to avenge Enkidu on Ishtar}$$
right$$\text{he sets out to stop being mortal, and asks for help}$$
⚠ Treating the netherworld dream as a scene of punishment

Nobody is tortured. The horror is that achievement does not travel.

wrong$$\text{the dead are punished in the house of dust}$$
right$$\text{the dead lose rank; kings serve and crowns are piled up}$$
⚠ Putting the carpe diem speech in the Standard Version's Tablet X

Most quoted passage, same volume, same character name in both versions.

wrong$$\text{in Tablet X Shiduri tells him to fill his belly}$$
right$$\text{on the Old Babylonian Sippar tablet she tells him that}$$
⚠ Treating Uta-napishti as a model to imitate

His own speech fixes death and life together, and he is settled beyond reach.

wrong$$\text{Uta-napishti shows that immortality is attainable}$$
right$$\text{his case is an exemption that is closed and removed}$$
⚠ Writing a claim nobody can disagree with

A claim that cannot fail cannot be credited. Could a classmate disagree?

wrong$$\text{the poem explores the theme of mortality}$$
right$$\text{the poem measures grief by what a mourner stops being}$$
⚠ Restating the quotation and calling it analysis

Swap the quotation: a paraphrase still makes sense, a warrant breaks.

wrong$$\text{this shows that Enkidu has changed a great deal}$$
right$$\text{the clause pairs a physical loss with a mental gain}$$
⚠ Quoting across a gap in the tablet

Dots mark lost surface. An argument across a break is about the shape of the gap.

wrong$$\text{he says he will cross the sea and take the plant home}$$
right$$\text{two fragments, with a break between them, Tablet XI}$$
⚠ Naming the ogre Huwawa while discussing the set text

Huwawa is the Sumerian and Old Babylonian form, so it signals a different text.

wrong$$\text{in Tablet V, Huwawa pleads for his life}$$
right$$\text{in Tablet V, Humbaba pleads for his life}$$
⚠ Listing similarities in a flood comparison

The resemblance is public since 1872. What is markable is what a difference does.

wrong$$\text{both have a boat, a survivor, birds and a sacrifice}$$
right$$\text{one detail, read in both, then checked on a second}$$
⚠ Ending an answer with a sentence about the present day

It costs a line and earns nothing. A consequence that reaches a passage connects.

wrong$$\text{this is still relevant to readers today}$$
right$$\text{this is why Tablet XI can repeat the prologue}$$
Formula card
Place the passage before you read it
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Which version, which tablet, which lines,}\\&\text{and is anything in brackets or dots?}\end{aligned}}$$

Applies to every passage in a volume that prints four texts in one sequence.

The frame is the argument
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Words repeated at both ends of a poem}\\&\text{are the poem naming its own subject.}\end{aligned}}$$

Needs an actual repetition: the survey instruction in Tablet I and in XI.

What a double is for
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{A double lets the poem place the hero's}\\&\text{problem outside him, and then remove it.}\end{aligned}}$$

The double has to be an equal, which is why the wrestling match ends level.

The consequence is built out of speech
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Act, then the words that own the act,}\\&\text{then the sentence that quotes both back.}\end{aligned}}$$

Works because the assembly names the offences. Not usable without a transcript.

The hinge
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Same hero, same strength, new question:}\\&\text{the second half asks what survives.}\end{aligned}}$$

Check a later scene: lions in IX, the stone crew in X. The abilities are intact.

Two failures, two kinds
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{One failure would name a fault.}\\&\text{Two failures of different kinds}\\&\text{name a condition instead.}\end{aligned}}$$

The two must differ in kind: one internal and unrepairable, one contingent.

The evidence paragraph
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Claim, then quotation with tablet and line,}\\&\text{then warrant about the wording,}\\&\text{then consequence.}\end{aligned}}$$

The claim must be capable of being wrong and the warrant must be about wording.

The replacement test for a warrant
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}&\text{Swap the quotation. If the sentence}\\&\text{still works, it was not a warrant.}\end{aligned}}$$

Applies to the sentence immediately after a quotation. Five seconds.

Check yourself

Close the book and write, from memory and in this order:

  • the three texts in your volume and what each is good for
  • the four things the prologue does
  • the two arcs and where the handover is
  • the chain of speech from the forest to the assembly
  • the two failures in Tablet XI
  • the four moves of an evidence paragraph

Then mark what you left out. That is what to reread, and nothing else is.

  • Place an unlabelled passage among the four texts, name the cue, and say when the cue is not enough?

    c-material-text

  • Say what the prologue promises, in four items, and check each one against the end of Tablet XI?

    c-prologue-frame

  • Explain why the wrestling match has to be a draw, and what would break two tablets later if it were not?

    c-enkidu-double

  • Write the chain from the proposal of the expedition to the assembly's sentence as four links, each with a speaker?

    c-humbaba-ishtar

  • Name three things that change at the hinge and one that does not, with a scene for each?

    c-death-of-enkidu

  • State what the Flood is needed for in Tablet XI, in Atra-hasis and in Genesis, and say which of the three could not do without its motive?

    c-quest-flood

  • Write a five sentence paragraph on an unseen passage in twelve minutes, with a tablet reference, a warrant about wording and one conceded objection?

    c-close-reading-essay

Glossary (28 terms)
epicdestan

A long narrative poem about actions a community treats as founding. Here the word is a question: what a poem must do to stand at the beginning of a tradition.

Standard Babylonian version

The eleven tablet poem beginning He who saw the Deep, put together in the later second millennium. The set text for this cluster.

Old Babylonian epic

The earlier Akkadian poem beginning Surpassing all other kings, about a third of which survives. Several of the most quoted lines belong here, not to the set text.

Tablet XII

An appendix translated closely from part of a Sumerian poem. Its Enkidu is alive and a servant, so it is no evidence about the main poem's friendship.

AkkadianAkadca

The language of Babylonia and Assyria, written in , in which the epic is composed.

SumerianSumerce

The earlier, unrelated language of southern Mesopotamia. The five short Bilgames poems are in it, and they are not the epic.

cuneiformcivi yazisi

Wedge-shaped writing pressed into wet clay. The medium breaks, so the poem reaches us with gaps the translation marks.

tablettablet

The clay object and the poem's own unit of division. Tablet numbers are the poem's structure, not a modern chapter scheme.

A gap in a damaged text, marked by dots. An argument built across one is about the shape of the damage.

Words the editor supplied from a parallel manuscript or a formula, in square brackets. Quotable if you say so.

close readingyakin okuma

An argument about wording: these words rather than others are doing specific work. Not a paraphrase and not a reaction.

claimiddia

The arguable sentence a paragraph exists to support. Could somebody with the same book disagree?

warrant

The sentence explaining why the quoted wording supports the claim. It earns the marks and it is most often missing.

evidencekanit

Six to twenty quoted words with a tablet and line reference. Plot summary is not evidence: it cannot be checked against wording.

A structure in which the closing lines repeat the opening ones. Here the survey instruction opens the poem and returns near the end of Tablet XI.

prologueonsoz

The first page: it names the hero by what he knows, claims a tale from before the Flood, and orders the reader to inspect the wall.

epithet

A standing phrase used in place of a name. He who saw the Deep is an epithet that became the poem's title.

counterpart

What the gods are asked for when the city complains: somebody to match him. It rules out both rival and servant.

the Deep

The freshwater abyss beneath the earth, home of secret knowledge and of the plant he dives for. Naming it in the first line makes knowledge the subject.

netherworldoluler diyari

The house of dust in Enkidu's second dream, where kings serve and crowns are piled up. Nobody is tortured; rank does not survive.

lamentagit

The mourning speech of Tablet VIII, calling on the elders, the roads, the forest, the rivers and the animals to weep.

the Floodtufan

The deluge Uta-napishti survived, told in the first person in Tablet XI. It arrives as evidence for a rule already stated, not as a story about punishment.

immortalityolumsuzluk

What he goes to ask for and does not get. The poem offers two substitutes: a name, and work that outlasts the worker.

covenantahit

A binding promise. Used here only for comparison: Genesis ends in one, Tablet XI in an exemption placed out of reach.

tavern-keepermeyhaneci

Shiduri, at the edge of the sea. In the set text she sends him to the ferryman; the famous advice to enjoy life is Old Babylonian.

ferrymankayikci

Ur-shanabi, who takes him across the Waters of Death after his stone crew is destroyed, and who hears the poem's closing instruction.

translationceviri

One scholar's English, with brackets, dots and parentheses. The binding syllabus says other editions or translations will not be accepted, so check with your instructor.

primary textbirincil metin

The poem itself, as against an introduction or a commentary. All three are between the same covers and only one is the poem.

What comes next
§03 · Founding Cultures: The Iliad

The cluster names two texts and we have taken the first. The next takes Homer, and the comparison that pays is set up here: both poems lose the hero's closest companion in the middle, and what each does afterwards is the difference.

Sources
  • kitapThe Epic of Gilgamesh, translated by Andrew George, Penguin Classics, 2003 The set volume. It prints the eleven tablet Standard Babylonian version, Tablet XII, the surviving Old Babylonian material and five Sumerian poems about Bilgames, with an introduction and an apparatus of brackets and dots. All four texts share one page sequence, which is why this section insists on tablet and line references.
  • ders malzemesiThe General Syllabus binding every section of this course, dated 2025 to 2026 Sets the four thematic clusters and their week ranges, names the required translations, states that other editions or translations will not be accepted, and gives the weighting used in the exam note above. It also leaves two text choices explicitly to the section, which is why nothing in this section says that a particular text is read by everyone.
  • ders malzemesiThe programme's own letter grade table and requirements page, undated Gives the common letter scale for all sections and an attendance limit, and gives a different weighting from the General Syllabus. Both pages are official, which is why both weightings appear above and why the dated one is the one to plan around.
  • sabitAtra-hasis, and Genesis 6 to 9 Used in this section only as comparison material for Tablet XI. Neither is on your reading list and you are not responsible for either as a text.

Spotted something missing or wrong? tell us · share your own notes or an old exam.

Last updated .