6 concepts16 worked examples24 exercises3 exam-level4 figures
What are you here for?
03The Integral Test, the Comparison Tests, and Alternating Series
The quiz gives you three sums that all fade to nothing term by term: $\sum \tfrac1{n^2}$, $\sum \tfrac1{n}$, and $\sum \tfrac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}$. One adds up to a finite number, one runs off to infinity, and one only settles because of its minus signs. Nothing about the shrinking terms alone tells them apart, and that is exactly the gap this week closes.
By the end you can look at a positive series and pick the one test that decides it, read off a in one glance, and put a guaranteed decimal bound on a sum you cannot add up by hand.
In 60 seconds
Four tests decide almost every series in this course: the Integral Test and its p-series shortcut, the two Comparison Tests, and the Alternating Series Test.
Integral Test
$$\sum a_n \text{ and } \int_1^\infty f\,dx \text{ agree}$$
terms are positive and decreasing and $f(x)$ is easy to integrate
p-series
$$\sum \tfrac1{n^p}\ \text{converges}\iff p>1$$
the term is a single power of $n$, or a yardstick for comparison
Comparison / Limit Comparison
$$0\le a_n\le b_n\ \text{ or }\ \tfrac{a_n}{b_n}\to c$$
the term looks like a p-series or geometric series for large $n$
Reading the Integral Test value as the sum: it decides convergence, it is not the total.
Comparing the wrong way, so the inequality you prove says nothing about your series.
Calling an alternating series without checking that the sizes decrease to zero.
Quizzes and homework carry this material; expect to name the test and justify each hypothesis, since a right answer with the wrong reason loses the marks.
How much time do you have?
10 minutes
You walk in able to spot a p-series, run one comparison, and quote the alternating rule.
card, c-p-series, c-comparison, formula card
45 minutes
You can also set up the Integral Test cleanly and choose between direct and limit comparison without guessing.
card, c-integral-test, c-p-series, c-comparison, c-limit-comparison, c-alternating, scaffolding ladder, practice C
full read
Everything above plus the remainder estimates that turn convergence into a guaranteed decimal, and the mixed practice that decides whether you can pick a test unprompted.
all concepts, exam example, practice A, practice B, practice C, practice D
By the end of this section
Apply the Integral Test to a positive decreasing series and state the hypotheses you relied on.
Classify a p-series as convergent or from its exponent alone, and use it as a comparison yardstick.
Prove convergence or divergence with the Direct Comparison Test, choosing an inequality that points the right way.
Use the Limit Comparison Test when a clean inequality is hard, and read the ratio limit correctly.
Test an alternating series for convergence by checking that the sizes decrease to zero.
Estimate a convergent sum and bound the error, using the integral remainder or the alternating remainder.
Syllabus coverage
11.3
The Integral Test and estimates of sums
The test itself and the p-series shortcut it produces sit here; the estimate-of-sums half of 11.3 is the integral remainder in the estimates block.
covered
11.4
The Comparison Tests
Direct comparison first, then the limit comparison test as the tool for when a clean inequality is awkward.
covered
11.5
Alternating series
The Alternating Series Test and its estimation theorem; absolute versus conditional convergence belongs to the next section and is not assumed here.
covered
Recall first
Convergence of a series
$\sum a_n$ converges to $S$ when its $s_N=\sum_{n=1}^N a_n$ have the finite limit $S$. Otherwise it diverges.
Every test in this section is a statement about those partial sums, reached without computing them directly.
The n-th term test for divergence
If $\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n \neq 0$ (or fails to exist), then $\sum a_n$ diverges. If $a_n\to 0$, this test is silent.
It is the first filter and the reason the harder tests exist: the interesting series are exactly the ones whose terms do go to zero.
Geometric series
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty ar^n=\dfrac{a}{1-r}$ when $\lvert r\rvert<1$, and diverges when $\lvert r\rvert\ge 1$.
It is the second yardstick, alongside the p-series, that the comparison tests hold a messy term up against.
Improper integral
$\int_1^\infty f(x)\,dx=\lim_{t\to\infty}\int_1^t f(x)\,dx$; it converges when that limit is finite.
The Integral Test is exactly the bridge from this limit, which you can compute, to the series limit, which you cannot.
Try it yourself first (2 questions)
1§03.0 — does shrinking guarantee a sum●●○○○
Here is the intuition this whole week has to correct. A student argues: the terms of the $\sum \frac1n$ get as small as you like, so the running total cannot keep growing and the series must converge.
Given
the series is $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1n$
its terms satisfy $\frac1n\to 0$
Find
(a) Is the claim that the series converges true or false?
Hint 1/4
Separate two questions the student has merged: do the terms go to zero, and does the sum stay finite? They are not the same question.
Hint 2/4
The n-th term test only says $a_n\to0$ is necessary. It never promises the sum is finite, so a term going to zero settles nothing on its own.
Hint 3/4
Group the terms: $\frac13+\frac14>\frac12$, and $\frac15+\cdots+\frac18>\frac12$. Each block of this kind adds more than $\frac12$, and there are infinitely many blocks.
Hint 4/4
So the partial sums pass every bound: the harmonic series diverges, and the claim is false.
Show solutionBound blocks of terms from below
$$\tfrac13+\tfrac14>\tfrac14+\tfrac14=\tfrac12$$
each block of terms is replaced by its smallest member, making the total only smaller
The partial sums exceed $1+k/2$, which itself has no finite limit, so no finite ceiling exists.
Terms tending to zero is the entrance fee, not the prize: it lets a series compete, nothing more.
2§03.0 — a geometric warm up●○○○○
Before the new tests, one series you can already total exactly. It appears constantly as a comparison yardstick, so the arithmetic should be automatic.
Given
the series is $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\tfrac13\right)^{n}$
Find
(a) Does it converge, and if so to what sum?
Hint 1/4
Recognise the shape: a constant ratio between consecutive terms means a geometric series, which you can sum in closed form.
Hint 2/4
For $\sum_{n=1}^\infty ar^{n-1}$ with first term $a$ and ratio $r$, the sum is $\frac{a}{1-r}$ when $\lvert r\rvert<1$.
Hint 3/4
Here the first term (at $n=1$) is $a=\frac13$ and the ratio is $r=\frac13$, so restate: $a=\tfrac13$, $r=\tfrac13$.
Hint 4/4
So the sum is $\dfrac{1/3}{1-1/3}=\dfrac12$.
Show solutionApply the closed form
$$S=\frac{a}{1-r}=\frac{1/3}{1-1/3}$$
the geometric sum formula, valid because $\lvert r\rvert<1$
$$=\frac{1/3}{2/3}=\frac12$$
clear the compound fraction
Answer $$\boxed{S=\tfrac12}$$
Check
Add the first few terms: $0.333+0.111+0.037+\cdots$ is already $0.481$ and still climbing toward $0.5$.
Every geometric series with $\lvert r\rvert<1$ is a known convergent yardstick for the comparison tests ahead.
Notation
symbol
reads as
means
watch out
$\sum a_n$
the sum of a n
the $a_1+a_2+a_3+\cdots$, shorthand for the limit of its partial sums
the same symbol names the process and its value; $\sum a_n$ 'diverges' means that value does not exist
$s_N$
s sub capital N
the $N$-th partial sum $a_1+\cdots+a_N$, a finite number you can actually add up
lower-case $a_N$ is one term; $s_N$ is the running total of the first $N$
$R_n$
R sub n
the remainder $S-s_n$: everything the tail $a_{n+1}+a_{n+2}+\cdots$ still contributes after $n$ terms
$R_n$ is what you have not yet added, so a small $R_n$ means $s_n$ is already a good estimate
$p$
p
the exponent in a p-series $\sum 1/n^p$; the single number that decides convergence
the cutoff $p>1$ is strict, so $p=1$ (the harmonic series) diverges
Conventions used here
Where the index starts does not decide convergence
Whether a sum begins at $n=1$ or $n=5$ changes the total but never whether it converges: dropping finitely many terms only shifts the sum by a finite amount. So 'for all $n$' in a test may be relaxed to 'for all $n$ beyond some point'.
The Integral Test value is not the sum
When the Integral Test applies, $\int_1^\infty f\,dx$ and $\sum a_n$ share a fate, convergent or divergent, but their numerical values are different. The integral decides; it does not total the series.
Divergence means the partial sums have no finite limit
A positive series either converges to a finite number or diverges to $+\infty$; there is no oscillating middle case. For an alternating series, divergence usually shows up as terms that fail to reach zero.
3.1The Integral Test
Match the terms to a curve you can integrate; a finite area under it means a finite sum.
Where we stand: we can kill a series when its terms miss zero, and total a geometric one exactly. Everything in between — starting with $\sum 1/n^2$ — has no verdict yet.
Solvable with what we have
total a geometric series such as $\sum (1/2)^n$ exactly
reject $\sum \frac{n}{n+1}$ at a glance, since its terms tend to $1$, not $0$
compute any partial sum $s_N$ of $\sum \frac1{n^2}$ by hand
Not solvable yet
decide $\sum \frac1{n^2}$, whose terms do tend to $0$
decide the harmonic series $\sum \frac1n$, whose terms also tend to $0$
say whether the partial sums of $\sum \frac1n$ ever stop climbing
The terms of $\sum \frac1n$ shrink to $0$, so the running total must level off, so the series converges.
Why it fails
The partial sums keep climbing without bound: group them as $1+\tfrac12+\left(\tfrac13+\tfrac14\right)+\left(\tfrac15+\cdots+\tfrac18\right)+\cdots$, and every bracket totals more than $\tfrac12$. Adding more than $\tfrac12$ infinitely often passes every ceiling. Shrinking terms are necessary for convergence but never sufficient; what settles it is how fast the terms shrink, and the area under a matching curve measures exactly that speed.
TheoremTheorem 11.3.1: The Integral Test
Conditions
$f$ is continuous, positive, and decreasing on $[1,\infty)$
the terms come from that function: $a_n=f(n)$
these need hold only for $n\ge N$, since the first few terms never change convergence
If the area under the matching curve is finite, the sum is finite; if the area is infinite, the sum runs off to infinity as well.
The right-anchored rectangles of height $\textcolor{#d1690a}{a_n}$ fit beneath the $\textcolor{#1f6feb}{\text{curve }y=1/x}$, so their combined area is at most $\int_1^\infty \frac{dx}{x}$. Here that integral is infinite, so the bars — the harmonic series — have no finite ceiling either.
Looks like this, but is not
$\int_1^\infty \frac{dx}{x^2}=1$, so the sum must be $\sum \frac1{n^2}=1$.
The test compares the sum to the integral; it never equates them. The integral is exactly $1$, but the sum is $\pi^2/6\approx 1.6449$. The Integral Test reports 'finite', not 'how much'. The rectangles overshoot the curve on the left, so the sum sits above the integral.
Deciding the series of 1 over n squared
Use the Integral Test to decide whether $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{n^2}$ converges.
Given
$a_n=\frac1{n^2}$
the matching function is $f(x)=\frac1{x^2}$
Find
convergence or divergence
SolutionCheck the three hypotheses
$$f(x)=x^{-2}>0\ \text{on}\ [1,\infty)$$
positive, so the rectangles have real height
$$f'(x)=-2x^{-3}<0$$
the derivative is negative, so $f$ is decreasing as required
Sign and size check: the integral came out positive and finite, and the true sum $\pi^2/6\approx1.645$ is finite and a bit above $1$, exactly as the rectangles predict.
one improper integral, evaluated once.
A finite integral is a certificate of convergence, but its number ($1$ here) is not the sum.
A logarithm hiding a divergence
Decide $\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n\ln n}$ with the Integral Test.
Given
$a_n=\frac1{n\ln n}$
$f(x)=\frac1{x\ln x}$ on $[2,\infty)$
Find
convergence or divergence
SolutionConfirm the hypotheses on the shifted start
Cross-check the direction: the terms $\frac1{n\ln n}$ are larger than a p-series with $p$ just above $1$ would suggest, and $\ln(\ln x)\to\infty$ confirms the slow escape to infinity.
one substitution, one improper integral.
A logarithm in the denominator is the classic near-miss: the terms shrink faster than $1/n$ yet still not fast enough.
Checkpoint
§03.1 — what the integral value means●●○○○
You verify the hypotheses for $\sum 1/n^2$ and compute the matching integral $\int_1^\infty \frac{dx}{x^2}=1$.
Given
the Integral Test hypotheses hold
$\int_1^\infty x^{-2}\,dx=1$
Find
(a) What may you correctly conclude?
Hint 1/4
Ask what the theorem actually promises: a shared verdict, or a shared number? Those are different claims.
Hint 2/4
The Integral Test says $\sum a_n$ and $\int_1^\infty f$ converge or diverge together; it says nothing about their values matching.
Hint 3/4
Here the integral is finite (it equals $1$), so restate what that licenses: the sum is finite, i.e. it converges.
Hint 4/4
So the sum converges to some finite number, which happens to be $\pi^2/6\approx1.6449$, not $1$.
One over n to the p adds to a finite total exactly when the exponent is strictly bigger than one.
Looks like this, but is not
$p=1$ is close enough to the convergent zone, so the harmonic series $\sum 1/n$ should just barely converge.
The cutoff is strict. At $p=1$ the integral is $\ln t\to\infty$, so $\sum 1/n$ diverges. Even $p=1.0001$ converges while $p=1$ does not: the boundary belongs to the divergent side.
N
sum 1/n^2 (p=2)
sum 1/n (p=1)
sum 1/sqrt(n) (p=1/2)
10
1.5498
2.9290
5.0210
100
1.6350
5.1874
18.5896
1000
1.6439
7.4855
61.8010
10000
1.6448
9.7876
198.5446
The first column is closing in on $\pi^2/6\approx1.6449$. The other two never stop growing, one slowly ($p=1$) and one faster ($p=\tfrac12$), which is exactly the $p>1$ cutoff in numbers.
Two powers, opposite fates
Classify $\sum \frac1{n^{3}}$ and $\sum \frac1{\sqrt{n}}$.
Given
first term $\frac1{n^3}$, so $p=3$
second term $\frac1{\sqrt n}=n^{-1/2}$, so $p=\tfrac12$
$\frac1{n\sqrt n}$ does not look like a p-series until the powers are combined
wrong$$\tfrac1{n\sqrt n}\ \text{is not a p-series}$$
right$$\tfrac1{n\sqrt n}=n^{-3/2},\ p=\tfrac32$$
3.3The Direct Comparison Test
Trap a messy positive term between yourself and a known series, term by term, and inherit its fate.
The p-series and geometric series are known yardsticks. Comparison lets us judge a term we cannot integrate by holding it against one of them, one index at a time.
TheoremTheorem 11.4.1: The Comparison Test
Conditions
both series have positive terms: $a_n,b_n>0$
the comparison holds eventually: $a_n\le b_n$ for all $n\ge N$
A series squeezed under a convergent one also converges; a series propping a divergent one up from below also diverges.
At every index the $\textcolor{#d1690a}{\text{orange term }a_n=1/(n^2+n)}$ is shorter than the $\textcolor{#1f6feb}{\text{blue term }b_n=1/n^2}$. Since the blue series (a $p=2$ series) converges, the orange series is trapped underneath and converges too.
Looks like this, but is not
$\frac1{n^2}\le\frac1n$ and $\sum \frac1n$ diverges, so $\sum \frac1{n^2}$ diverges.
This compares the wrong way. Being below a divergent series says nothing: a short bar under an infinitely tall stack can still add to a finite total. Indeed $\sum 1/n^2$ converges. To prove convergence you must sit under a convergent series; to prove divergence you must sit above a divergent one.
A term tucked under a geometric series
Decide $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{2^n+n}$ by comparison.
When a clean inequality is a fight, compare growth rates instead: a positive finite ratio means the two series share a fate.
Direct comparison needs a clean inequality, and for a term like $\frac{2n^2+3n}{\sqrt{5+n^5}}$ that is real work. Comparing the rate* of shrink sidesteps the algebra.*
TheoremTheorem 11.4.2: The Limit Comparison Test
Conditions
both series have positive terms: $a_n,b_n>0$
the ratio has a positive finite limit: $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}=c,\ 0<c<\infty$
If two positive series shrink at the same rate, so their ratio settles on a positive number, they converge together or diverge together.
Looks like this, but is not
The ratio $a_n/b_n\to0$, so $a_n$ and $b_n$ must still share a fate.
A limit of $0$ (or $\infty$) is outside $(0,\infty)$, and the two-way conclusion fails there. A limit of $0$ only says $a_n$ is eventually much smaller than $b_n$: useful one way (if $\sum b_n$ converges), useless the other. The test's power comes precisely from the ratio being a positive, finite number.
n
a_n
b_n = 1/n^2
ratio a_n/b_n
1
2.5000
1.0000
2.5000
5
0.0819
0.0400
2.0480
20
0.005006
0.002500
2.0025
100
0.00020003
0.00010000
2.0003
The ratio homes in on $2$, a positive finite number. So $a_n$ tracks the convergent $1/n^2$ up to a constant, and the series converges with it.
keeping a lower-order term in the estimate points at the wrong p-series
wrong$$\frac{n+2}{n^3+1}\approx\frac1n$$
right$$\frac{n+2}{n^3+1}\approx\frac1{n^2}$$
3.5The Alternating Series Test
When signs alternate and the sizes shrink to zero, cancellation alone forces convergence, even where the sizes' own series diverges.
Every test so far demanded positive terms. Alternating signs change the story: cancellation can rescue a series whose sizes, added blindly, would diverge.
TheoremTheorem 11.5.1: The Alternating Series Test
Conditions
the series alternates: $\sum(-1)^{n-1}b_n$ with $b_n>0$
the sizes decrease: $b_{n+1}\le b_n$ eventually
the sizes vanish: $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}b_n=0$
An alternating series whose sizes decrease steadily to zero always converges.
The partial sums of $\sum(-1)^{n-1}/n$: $\textcolor{#1f6feb}{\text{odd sums}}$ step down, $\textcolor{#d1690a}{\text{even sums}}$ step up, and each pair brackets the limit $\textcolor{#2f9e44}{S=\ln 2}$ in a shorter interval than the last.
Looks like this, but is not
$\sum(-1)^{n}\frac{3n}{4n-1}$ alternates, so it converges.
Alternating is not enough; the sizes must reach zero. Here $b_n=\frac{3n}{4n-1}\to\frac34\neq0$, so the terms do not vanish and the n-th term test kills the series outright. Check $b_n\to0$ before anything else.
Convergence promises a number exists; the remainder estimates hand you that number to a guaranteed number of decimals.
A convergence verdict says a total exists. What an exam or a computer actually needs is that total to, say, three decimals, with a guarantee on the error.
NoteTwo remainder bounds
Conditions
integral remainder: the Integral Test hypotheses hold for $f$
alternating remainder: the Alternating Series Test hypotheses hold
For a positive decreasing series the leftover sits between the two tail integrals; for an alternating series the leftover is no bigger than the first term you dropped.
Past the cutoff $n=4$, the $\textcolor{#2f9e44}{\text{tail rectangles}}$ add up to the remainder $R_4$. The $\textcolor{#1f6feb}{\text{curve }y=1/x^2}$ traps that area between $\int_5^\infty$ and $\int_4^\infty$, which is how the remainder gets its two-sided bound.
Looks like this, but is not
$\lvert R_n\rvert\le b_{n+1}$ is a handy bound, so use it on $\sum \frac1{n^2}$ after $n$ terms.
That bound is for alternating series only. $\sum 1/n^2$ has all-positive terms; its remainder is bounded by the tail integral, not by the next term. Using the wrong remainder rule gives a bound that is not valid.
Pinning down the sum of 1 over n squared
Use $s_{10}$ and the integral remainder to bracket $S=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{n^2}$.
off-by-one: the term you just added feels like the relevant one
wrong$$\lvert R_n\rvert\le b_n$$
right$$\lvert R_n\rvert\le b_{n+1}$$
Choosing a convergence test
you are handed a series and must decide which of this section's tests to reach for
Check the terms reach zero
If $a_n\not\to0$, stop: the series diverges by the n-th term test. Only bother with the rest when $a_n\to0$.
Look for a single power or an exponential
A bare $1/n^p$ is a p-series; a bare $r^n$ is geometric. Read the verdict directly.
For a rational or root-of-polynomial term, compare
Keep the highest power top and bottom to guess the rate, pick that p-series as $b_n$, then confirm with limit comparison.
For alternating signs, use the alternating test
Check the sizes $b_n$ decrease to $0$. If the sizes fail to reach $0$, it is the n-th term test again.
For a term you can integrate, use the Integral Test
When $f(x)$ is easy to integrate (logs, exponentials, simple powers), the Integral Test both decides and estimates.
Where it goes wrong
jumping to a test before checking $a_n\to0$
comparing the wrong way with direct comparison
Running a limit comparison cleanly
the term is a ratio or root of polynomials that looks like a p-series but is not exactly one
Estimate the rate
Replace top and bottom by their highest powers to see how the term decays, e.g. $\frac{2n^2+3n}{\sqrt{5+n^5}}\approx \frac{2}{n^{1/2}}$.
Strip to a bare p-series
Drop the constant to name $b_n=1/n^{p}$ with the same rate.
Take the ratio limit
Compute $\lim a_n/b_n$. A positive finite value licenses the test; $0$ or $\infty$ means you chose the wrong $b_n$.
Quote the yardstick's fate
State whether $\sum b_n$ converges (as a p-series) and conclude the same for $\sum a_n$.
Where it goes wrong
picking $b_n$ with the wrong power so the ratio is $0$ or $\infty$
forgetting to say the p-series verdict at the end
The harmonic series diverges
Classify $\sum \frac1n$.
Given
$a_n=\frac1n$, and $a_n\to0$
Find
convergence or divergence
SolutionRead it as a p-series
$$\sum \tfrac1n:\ p=1$$
a single power of $n$, exponent $1$
$$p=1\le1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{diverges}$$
the strict cutoff $p>1$ is missed at the boundary
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Diverges}}$$
Check
The Integral Test agrees: $\int_1^\infty dx/x=\ln t\to\infty$.
The p equals 2 series converges
Classify $\sum \frac1{n^2}$.
Given
$a_n=\frac1{n^2}$, and $a_n\to0$
Find
convergence or divergence
SolutionRead it as a p-series
$$\sum \tfrac1{n^2}:\ p=2$$
exponent $2$
$$p=2>1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{converges}$$
clear of the cutoff
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
The Integral Test agrees: $\int_1^\infty dx/x^2=1<\infty$.
Both have positive terms tending to zero and both look like $1/n^{\text{power}}$, yet one diverges and one converges.
How to tell them apart
The only thing separating them is the exponent against the strict cutoff $p>1$: $p=1$ diverges, $p=2$ converges. Shrinking terms are not the decider; the rate is.
Scaffolding comes off
The common skeleton
Estimate the rate: keep the highest power of $n$ on top and bottom to see how the term decays.
Name the yardstick: take $b_n=1/n^p$ (or a geometric $r^n$) with that same rate.
Pick the tool: use limit comparison (a positive finite ratio) unless a clean inequality makes direct comparison faster.
State the verdict: quote whether $\sum b_n$ converges and carry the shared fate to $\sum a_n$.
Degree gap bottom minus top is $4-2=2>1$, the convergent signature.
2 · you write the reasoning
Same skeleton, and the steps are written out. Supply the reason for each before opening it: decide $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2n+1}{n^2+n}$.
$a_n\approx\frac{2n}{n^2}=\frac2n$.
reasoning
Keep only the leading powers: top like $2n$, bottom like $n^2$, so the term decays like $2/n$.
Take $b_n=\frac1n$.
reasoning
Strip the constant $2$ to name the bare p-series yardstick of the same rate.
$\frac{a_n}{b_n}=\frac{(2n+1)n}{n^2+n}\to2$.
reasoning
A positive finite ratio ($2$) is exactly what limit comparison needs to link the two fates.
$\sum\frac1n$ diverges, so the series diverges.
reasoning
The yardstick is the harmonic series ($p=1$), which diverges, so the series diverges with it.
3 · find the buried error
Harder term, and a solution written by someone else. Exactly two of the four steps contain an error. Find both before reading on: decide $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2n^2+5}{n^3+1}$.
Step 1. For large $n$, $a_n\approx\frac{2n^2}{n^3}=\frac{2}{n^2}$.
Direct comparison agrees: $\frac{3^n}{4^n+1}<(3/4)^n$, a convergent geometric bound.
Full exam-style question
Name the test for each of three seriesexam format
Classify each series as convergent or divergent, and name the test you used: (a) $\sum \frac{n}{n^2+1}$, (b) $\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac1{n(\ln n)^2}$, (c) $\sum \frac{(-1)^{n-1}\,n}{n^2+1}$.
Given
three series, (a) positive, (b) positive, (c) alternating
Find
a verdict and a named test for each part
Solution(a) Limit comparison with the harmonic series
Consistency check: (a) and (c) share the same sizes $n/(n^2+1)\approx1/n$, yet (a) diverges and (c) converges — the alternating signs in (c) are doing the work, exactly the theme of this section.
one limit comparison, one integral with a substitution, one alternating check.
On an exam, naming the test and verifying its hypotheses earns the marks; a bare 'converges' with no test named usually does not.
Practice
A · concept 3 questions
1§03.1 — does vanishing settle it●○○○○
A classmate writes: the terms of $\sum \frac1{\sqrt n}$ go to zero, so the series converges. Judge the reasoning, not just the answer.
Given
$a_n=\frac1{\sqrt n}\to0$
Find
(a) True or false: the series converges?
Hint 1/4
Terms going to zero is only the entry condition; it never decides convergence by itself.
Hint 2/4
Read it as a p-series: $\frac1{\sqrt n}=n^{-1/2}$, and the rule is convergence iff $p>1$.
Hint 3/4
Here $p=\frac12$, so restate: $p=\frac12\le1$.
Hint 4/4
With $p\le1$ the series diverges, so the claim is false.
Show solution
The term is a single power of $n$, so we read the exponent instead of testing terms one by one; a comparison here would only re-derive the p-series rule.
Write the term as a power of n
$$\frac1{\sqrt n}=n^{-1/2},\ p=\tfrac12$$
a root is a fractional power, so naming $p$ is all the p-series rule needs
Compare the exponent to the cutoff
$$p=\tfrac12\le1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{diverges}$$
the cutoff $p>1$ is strict and $\tfrac12$ falls on the divergent side, so the claim is false
Answer $$\boxed{\text{False}}$$
Check
It is termwise larger than the harmonic series, which already diverges.
Terms going to zero is the entry ticket, never the verdict; for a bare power the exponent alone decides.
2§03.1 — the one thing convergence guarantees●○○○○
Another claim: if $\sum a_n$ converges, then $a_n\to0$. Decide whether this direction holds.
Given
$\sum a_n$ is given to converge
Find
(a) True or false?
Hint 1/4
This is the reverse of the n-th term test; ask whether a finite total can tolerate terms that do not shrink.
Hint 2/4
If the partial sums approach a limit $S$, then $a_n=s_n-s_{n-1}\to S-S=0$.
Hint 3/4
So convergence forces $a_n\to0$; restate: the difference of two things heading to $S$ heads to $0$.
Hint 4/4
Hence the statement is true.
Show solution
We argue straight from the definition of convergence rather than from any test, because the claim is about what convergence itself forces on the terms.
Write each term as a difference of partial sums
$$a_n=s_n-s_{n-1}$$
every term is the jump between consecutive running totals, by the definition of $s_n$
both totals chase the same limit $S$, so their difference is squeezed to zero and the claim holds
Answer $$\boxed{\text{True}}$$
Check
This is exactly why the n-th term test is valid as a divergence test.
This is a one-way street: convergence forces $a_n\to0$, but $a_n\to0$ never forces convergence, which is why the n-th term test can only reject.
3§03.2 — just past the cutoff●●○○○
Speed round: classify $\sum \frac1{n^{1.01}}$, which looks deceptively like the harmonic series for small $n$.
Given
$a_n=n^{-1.01}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge?
Hint 1/4
Ignore how it looks for small $n$; convergence is about the tail and the exponent decides it.
Hint 2/4
The p-series rule: convergence iff $p>1$, no matter how close $p$ is to $1$.
Hint 3/4
Here $p=1.01$, so restate: $1.01>1$.
Hint 4/4
Since $p>1$, the series converges.
Show solution
A single power of $n$ is settled by its exponent alone, so we skip any comparison and read $p$ off directly.
Read the exponent
$$a_n=n^{-1.01},\ p=1.01$$
the term is already one power of $n$, so $p$ is visible without rewriting
Compare to the strict cutoff
$$p=1.01>1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{converges}$$
$1.01$ clears $1$, so the tail is summable and the small-$n$ resemblance to $1/n$ is irrelevant
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
Its tail integral $\int_1^\infty x^{-1.01}dx=1/0.01=100$ is finite.
Never round the exponent: $1.01$ and $1$ sit on opposite sides of the cutoff even though they look almost equal.
B · computation 6 questions
1§03.1 — a clean Integral Test●●○○○
Set up and run the Integral Test on a term built for it.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty n e^{-n^2}$
$f(x)=x e^{-x^2}$, positive and eventually decreasing
Find
(a) Converge or diverge?
Hint 1/4
The extra factor of $x$ in front is a hint that a substitution will integrate this cleanly.
Hint 2/4
Use the Integral Test: evaluate $\int_1^\infty x e^{-x^2}\,dx$ and read off its finiteness.
Hint 3/4
Let $u=x^2$, $du=2x\,dx$, so $\int x e^{-x^2}dx=\frac12\int e^{-u}du$; restate the integral in $u$.
Hint 4/4
The integral is $\frac1{2e}$, finite, so the series converges.
Show solution
The factor $x$ out front is exactly the derivative of $x^2$, so $u=x^2$ clears the integral in one move; without that matching factor the Integral Test would be far more work.
Substitute to match the front factor
$$u=x^2,\ du=2x\,dx$$
$x\,dx=\tfrac12\,du$, so the loose $x$ is absorbed exactly, which is why this substitution is the cheap route
Rewrite the root as a power of $n$ so the exponent is visible.
Hint 2/4
Then apply the p-series rule: convergence iff $p>1$.
Hint 3/4
$\sqrt[3]{n^2}=n^{2/3}$, so restate: $p=\frac23$.
Hint 4/4
Since $p=\frac23\le1$, it diverges.
Show solution
A root is just a fractional power, so we rewrite it as $n^{-p}$ and use the p-series rule instead of hunting for a comparison.
Rewrite the root as a power
$$\frac1{\sqrt[3]{n^2}}=n^{-2/3},\ p=\tfrac23$$
a cube root of $n^2$ is $n^{2/3}$, so $p=\tfrac23$ is now readable
Compare to the cutoff
$$p=\tfrac23\le1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{diverges}$$
$\tfrac23$ is below the strict cutoff, so the series diverges like a shallow p-series
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Diverges}}$$
Check
Termwise larger than the harmonic series, which diverges.
Roots hide the exponent; convert to $n^{-p}$ first and the verdict is immediate.
3§03.3 — a direct comparison●●○○○
Bound the term above by a convergent yardstick.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{n^3+2n}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge, by direct comparison?
Hint 1/4
Drop the smaller piece of the denominator to make a cleaner, larger term above yours.
Hint 2/4
Direct comparison for convergence: find $b_n\ge a_n$ with $\sum b_n$ convergent.
Hint 3/4
Since $n^3+2n>n^3$, restate: $\frac1{n^3+2n}<\frac1{n^3}$, and $\sum 1/n^3$ converges ($p=3$).
Hint 4/4
Under a convergent yardstick, the series converges.
Show solution
The denominator is a p-series denominator plus a positive nuisance, so a one-line direct comparison beats limit comparison; dropping the nuisance gives the yardstick at once.
with a finite positive ratio, the series and its yardstick converge together
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
Degree gap $3-1=2>1$, the convergent signature.
For a ratio of polynomials, subtract degrees: bottom minus top above $1$ means convergence, and the leading coefficients only set the ratio, not the verdict.
5§03.5 — an alternating test●●○○○
Signs alternate; check the two size conditions.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{2n+1}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge, by the Alternating Series Test?
Hint 1/4
For an alternating series, isolate the sizes $b_n$ and test two things: do they shrink, and do they reach zero?
Hint 2/4
The test needs $b_{n+1}\le b_n$ and $b_n\to0$.
Hint 3/4
Here $b_n=\frac1{2n+1}$; restate: it decreases and $\frac1{2n+1}\to0$.
Hint 4/4
Both hold, so the series converges.
Show solution
The signs alternate, so we check the two Leibniz conditions rather than any positive-series test, which would not apply to a signed series.
Check the sizes decrease
$$b_{n+1}=\tfrac1{2n+3}<\tfrac1{2n+1}=b_n$$
the denominator grows, so each size is strictly smaller than the last
Check the sizes vanish
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}\tfrac1{2n+1}=0$$
the denominator runs to infinity, so the sizes reach zero
Fire the test
$$b_n\downarrow0\ \Rightarrow\ \text{converges}$$
both Leibniz conditions hold, so the alternating series converges
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
This is the Leibniz series for $\tfrac{\pi}{4}$, known to converge.
For an alternating series, never test the signless term for convergence; only that its size decreases to zero.
6§03.4 — a hidden simplification●●●○○
Before choosing a test, simplify: the term collapses to a familiar one.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n+1}{n^3+n^2}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge?
Hint 1/4
Factor the denominator before comparing; a common factor may cancel the numerator entirely.
Hint 2/4
If the term simplifies to a p-series, read the verdict straight off.
Hint 3/4
$n^3+n^2=n^2(n+1)$, so restate: $\frac{n+1}{n^2(n+1)}=\frac1{n^2}$.
Hint 4/4
So the series is exactly $\sum 1/n^2$, which converges.
Show solution
Before naming any test we factor and cancel: the term collapses to an exact p-series, so a comparison or ratio would be wasted effort.
Factor the denominator
$$n^3+n^2=n^2(n+1)$$
pulling out $n^2$ exposes the shared $(n+1)$ that will cancel
Cancel the common factor
$$\frac{n+1}{n^2(n+1)}=\frac1{n^2}$$
the $(n+1)$ on top kills the one below, leaving a bare power
Classify the survivor
$$p=2>1\ \Rightarrow\ \text{converges}$$
the term is identically $1/n^2$, a $p=2$ series past the cutoff
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
No estimation needed; the term is identically $1/n^2$.
Always simplify before choosing a test; a term that cancels to $1/n^2$ needs no comparison at all.
C · exam level 3 questions
1§03.4 — a root in the denominator●●●○○
An exam favourite: a term that decays just slowly enough to diverge.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{\sqrt{n^2+1}}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge, and by what comparison?
Hint 1/4
Estimate the size for large $n$: the $+1$ under the root is negligible next to $n^2$.
Hint 2/4
Use limit comparison with the p-series that matches that rate.
Hint 3/4
$\sqrt{n^2+1}\approx n$, so $a_n\approx\frac1n$; restate $b_n=\frac1n$.
Hint 4/4
The ratio tends to $1$ and $\sum 1/n$ diverges, so the series diverges.
Show solution
The root blocks a clean inequality against $1/n$, so limit comparison reads the rate directly instead of forcing a bound that barely fails.
the harmonic yardstick diverges, so the series diverges with it
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Diverges}}$$
Check
For all $n$, $\sqrt{n^2+1}<n+1$, so $a_n>\frac1{n+1}$, above a divergent tail.
A square root of $n^2$ plus a constant decays like $1/n$; that borderline rate diverges, so read the rate, do not trust the shrinking look.
2§03.5 — alternating over a root●●●○○
The sizes here form a divergent series on their own, so the signs must be doing the work.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{\sqrt n}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge?
Hint 1/4
Note first that the sizes $1/\sqrt n$ form a divergent p-series, so any convergence is due to the alternation.
Hint 2/4
Apply the Alternating Series Test to the sizes $b_n=\frac1{\sqrt n}$: do they decrease to zero?
Hint 3/4
$\frac1{\sqrt{n+1}}<\frac1{\sqrt n}$ and $\frac1{\sqrt n}\to0$; restate: sizes decrease to $0$.
Hint 4/4
Both conditions hold, so the alternating series converges.
Show solution
The signless sizes form a divergent p-series, so no positive-series test can help; only the Alternating Series Test, which reads the signed structure, applies.
adding a finite total to an unbounded one stays unbounded, so the combined series diverges
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Diverges}}$$
Check
If the sum converged, subtracting the convergent geometric part would make $\sum 1/n$ converge, which it does not.
Convergent plus divergent is always divergent; only when both pieces converge may you split and add the sums.
3§03.5 — pick the test yourself●●●○○
No test is named and the type is hidden. Read the term and choose.
Given
$\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^{n-1}\,\frac{n^2}{n^3+1}$
Find
(a) Converge or diverge?
Hint 1/4
First name what kind of series this is; the alternating sign is the loudest clue.
Hint 2/4
For an alternating series, test the sizes $b_n=\frac{n^2}{n^3+1}$: do they decrease to zero?
Hint 3/4
$b_n\approx\frac{n^2}{n^3}=\frac1n\to0$ and eventually decreasing; restate: sizes decrease to $0$.
Hint 4/4
So the Alternating Series Test gives convergence.
Show solution
The $(-1)^{n-1}$ flags an alternating series, so we check the size conditions rather than comparing the signed term to a p-series, which the comparison tests forbid.
Check the sizes vanish
$$b_n=\frac{n^2}{n^3+1}\approx\frac1n\to0$$
the leading powers give a $1/n$ rate, so the sizes reach zero
Check the sizes decrease
$$b_n\ \text{decreasing for}\ n\ge1$$
the denominator outgrows the numerator, so each size falls; a few early terms never affect convergence
Fire the test
$$b_n\downarrow0\ \Rightarrow\ \text{converges}$$
both Leibniz conditions hold, so the alternating series converges
Answer $$\boxed{\text{Converges}}$$
Check
The signless sizes behave like $1/n$ and diverge, so again the signs carry the convergence.
When no test is named, let the $(-1)^{n-1}$ pick the tool: an alternating series is tested on its sizes, never compared as if it were positive.
Mistake ledger (12 entries)
⚠ Reporting the integral as the sum
the integral is the number you just computed, so it is tempting to hand it in as the total
$f$ is continuous, positive, and decreasing on $[1,\infty)$; the terms come from that function: $a_n=f(n)$; these need hold only for $n\ge N$, since the first few terms never change convergence
the series alternates: $\sum(-1)^{n-1}b_n$ with $b_n>0$; the sizes decrease: $b_{n+1}\le b_n$ eventually; the sizes vanish: $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}b_n=0$
integral remainder: the Integral Test hypotheses hold for $f$; alternating remainder: the Alternating Series Test hypotheses hold
Check yourself
Close the page and write, from memory: the three hypotheses of the Integral Test, the p-series cutoff (with the right inequality), the two directions of the Direct Comparison Test, the ratio condition of the Limit Comparison Test, the two size conditions of the Alternating Series Test, and the two remainder bounds. Then check against the formula card and mark only the ones you could not produce.
State the three Integral Test hypotheses and run it on $\sum 1/(n\ln n)$?
c-integral-test
Say the p-series verdict for $p=1$, $p=\tfrac32$, and $p=0.9$ without hesitation?
c-p-series
Pick a comparison that points the right way for a convergence proof and for a divergence proof?
c-comparison
Name the yardstick and take the ratio limit for $\frac{2n^2+3n}{\sqrt{5+n^5}}$?
c-limit-comparison
Check both alternating conditions and know which failure sends you to the n-th term test?
c-alternating
Use $\lvert R_n\rvert\le b_{n+1}$ to count the terms for a target accuracy?
c-estimates
Glossary (11 terms)
infinite seriesseri
The sum $a_1+a_2+a_3+\cdots$ of the terms of a sequence, defined as the limit of its partial sums when that limit exists.
partial sumkısmi toplam
The finite total $s_N=a_1+\cdots+a_N$ of the first $N$ terms; the series converges exactly when these have a finite limit.
p-seriesp serisi
A series $\sum 1/n^p$ for a constant $p$; it converges if and only if $p>1$.
harmonic seriesharmonik seri
The p-series $\sum 1/n$ with $p=1$; the standard example of a divergent series whose terms tend to zero.
Integral Testintegral testi
A test that ties a positive decreasing series to the improper integral of its matching function, so the two share convergence.
Comparison Testkarşılaştırma testi
A test that decides a positive series by a term-by-term inequality against a series of known behaviour.
Limit Comparison Testlimit karşılaştırma testi
A test that links two positive series when the limit of their ratio is a positive finite number, so they share a fate.
alternating seriesalmaşık seri
A series whose terms switch sign, written $\sum(-1)^{n-1}b_n$ with $b_n>0$.
remainderkalan
The tail $R_n=S-s_n$ left after $n$ terms; a bound on it turns a partial sum into a guaranteed estimate.
convergentyakınsak
Describing a series whose partial sums approach a finite limit.
divergentıraksak
Describing a series whose partial sums have no finite limit.
What comes next
§04 · Absolute convergence, the Ratio and Root Tests, and power series
This section decides positive series and cleanly alternating ones. Next comes the tool for the messy middle: absolute convergence, and the Ratio and Root Tests that read a series' fate from a single limit, followed by power series, where these tests find a radius of convergence.
Sources
James Stewart, Calculus, ninth edition — sections 11.3, 11.4 and 11.5 The three sections on this week's syllabus line; the theorem numbering and hypotheses follow this book.
Standard convergence tests for infinite series The Integral, Comparison, Limit Comparison, and Alternating Series Tests are standard results, stated here in the form used across calculus courses.